RE: [ga] New TLD White Paper released

["J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@club-internet.fr>]

On 21:16 20/03/03, Ross Wm. Rader said:
>No - it is an honest question and an honest statement to which I expect
>an honest answer. There are enough people in this conversation making
>fools of themselves, I don't need to add to that number.

Oh! Sorry. Please refere to my earlier post on the history and legitimacy.
There is only one name space.

So there is not several root files of the global name space. There is only
one global root file. We created it in 1977, extended it to Arpa in 1984,
used it to add the OSI datanetwork systlms (X.121 from 1983) and I still
extend now to domotic and telephone application (we will publish a draft
in a few months).

ICANN - as explained in my previous mail - is only managing a part
of that namespace. Not the whole namespaceby very far. ICANN is
just managing the legacy TLDs and the ARPA root which is part of the
global namespace. Not the global namespace by its own.

Both ".biz" are in the same namespace. And there is a conflict,
the first organized one in 23 years, worldwide. Inside the internet
and outside.

One can tell you that there is IN space and that there could be
other spaces. This is true, but the mental cost for the users
would be so important that it could only be accepted bewteen
main areas like the telephone, radio etc.

Open roots are just using the non legacy part of the neamespace.
As such the Legacy has no right on what is not its part. Except in
case of borders conflict (to settle them by concertation), since
no one is there anymore to serve as an arbitrator.

jfc









This makes theThis has nothing to do with the internet
but with the users' mind. When one calls Ross Wm Rader I expect
someone indentified to respond. Who ever is calling.

So




>-rwr
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin [mailto:jefsey@club-internet.fr]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:13 PM
> > To: ross@tucows.com
> > Subject: RE: [ga] New TLD White Paper released
> >
> >
> > Dear Ross,
> > Is that a joke or you make a fool of yourself on purpose or
> > what? Or you really have understood nothing? Cheers. Jfc
> >
> >
> > On 19:14 20/03/03, Ross Wm. Rader said:
> >
> > >Leah - help me understand why you are so worried about what
> > goes on in
> > >the USG root.
> > >
> > >The problem lies with real duplication - ie - putting two identical
> > >strings with different nameservers into the same root. Putting
> > >identical strings with different nameservers into different
> > roots has
> > >absolute no negative impact on the specific users of each
> > root unless
> > >of course the user has configured their machine to look for
> > >authoritative results from a non-authoritative source.
> > >
> > >
> > >                        -rwr
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the
> > shore like an
> > >idiot."
> > >- Steven Wright
> > >
> > >Get Blog... http://www.byte.org/
> > >
> > >--
> > >This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > >Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > >("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > >Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >---
> > >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> > >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > >Version: 6.0.461 / Virus Database: 260 - Release Date: 10/03/03
> >
> >
>
>
>
>---
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.461 / Virus Database: 260 - Release Date: 10/03/03

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html