Re: [ga] New TLD White Paper released

[eric@hi-tek.com]

I Can answer your questions easily.
Because i have great respect for their systems and process.
We believe in country integrity and politeness.
It really does not get more complicated.
Respect for human dignity and the use of the Internet for beneficial purposes
is all I propose.

Yes I have hung out in Melbourne and points beyond for some time. Yes I have
hit roos and played with Abos. I forget the name of the big rock we hiked
around for days.
I can play with a bully whip and find water in the Outback.My nose was broken
in a silly "tavern" but the other man suffered a broken arm in the Larrimah
area of the Northern Territory.  I still am not familiar enough with vegetation
there to live alone.
These concepts however have nothing to do with my concept.

AU was held in general by a crony of JP and has substantially been transferred
to a national group.
Canada was held in derilicti and is now progressing after change, Mexico is
ready for change and Vietnam is going to take off like a whirlwind for the
benefit of the country.

Inside/outside - marketing is education and education is marketing are
hallmarks in these endeavours.

Eric


Steven Heath wrote:

> eric@hi-tek.com wrote:
> >
> > > > And if all that is a contradictory mess - we look to the
> > course and conduct
> > > > between the parties
> > >
> > > Very good.  Now, take a hypothetical:
> > >
> > > Let's say that Country X does not control the corresponding
> > ccTLD in a zone
> > > file under the control of a private party who owns a root
> > server not located
> > > in Country X.  Let's say that Country X never has had
> > control of that ccTLD.
> > > As between Country X and the root server operator, the
> > course of dealing and
> > > conduct of the parties is pretty well established - i.e.
> > the ccTLD does not
> > > belong to Country X.
> > >
> >
> > Darn conundrum. When this "hypothetical" occurs ( .AU ) then
> > we see the results.
> > It is called redelegation.
>
> Really? OK, I know that some people get confused with country A and country
> X talk so lets use .au to compare to John Berryhill's hypothetical outline.
>
> Lets see, did .au reside in Australia?
>
> Yes... ok, that's different than Johns outline
>
> OK, was .au run by a resident of Australia?
>
> Yes... ok, that's different than Johns outline
>
> Hmm, ok, was the .au name servers etc located in country?
>
> Yes... ok, that's different than Johns outline
>
> OK Eric, can you please explain, using well written English, why you cited
> .au as an example of Johns hypothetical case?
>
> Steven Heath
> .nz news & views
> www.news.org.nz
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html