ICANN/GNSO
DNSO and GNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ga] New TLD White Paper released


Roberto

I can sympathize with your view on consumer election, but as for
organizations belonging or not to a country, I beleive that except for
atypical subjects of public international law, the rule is that everyone and
everything belongs to one country or another.

Atentamente, Regards
Rodrigo Orenday Serratos


-----Mensaje original-----
De: Roberto Gaetano [mailto:ploki_xyz@hotmail.com]
Enviado el: Viernes, 28 de Marzo de 2003 01:33 AM
Para: rorenday@banxico.org.mx
CC: ga@dnso.org
Asunto: RE: [ga] New TLD White Paper released


Rodrigo  Orenday Serrato wrote:

>
>Excuse me, but I find it nearsighted to state that the reason for the
>current interes in ccTLDs is simply due to the shortage of gTLDs. There are
>marketing reasons which may compel a service provider to seek a ccTLD
>rather
>than a gTLD, which go beyond the inavailability of one of the latter.
>
>"Mock-up gTLDs", such as .tv are another story.
>

You are absolutely right, I expressed myself incorrectly.
I did not want to imply that the interest on ccTLDs is due to the lack of
gTLDs, but that what IMHO is a misuse of the ccTLDs (what you call "Mock-up
gTLDs") has been incentivated by the lack of gTLDs.

Referring to a later post of you, about not having any need for gTLDs, you
might be correct, but I would prefer a world where you have both and the
customer choose. This will solve also the problems of the
people/organizations that don't want to be labelled as belonging to a
country.

Best regards
Roberto




_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>