[ga] ALAC on ccNSO

[DannyYounger@cs.com]

Vittorio,

You wrote:  "The Interim At Large Advisory Committee supports the idea of a 
Country
Code Names Supporting Organization as devised in the Report [referring to the 
Fifth Supplemental Implementation Report of ICANN's Evolution and Reform 
Committee]".  http://forum.icann.org/mail-archive/alac/msg00247.html

May I ask why the ALAC is endorsing the ERC/ccNSO Assistance Group 
recommendations instead of the "Resolutions adopted by the ccTLD Managers 
meeting in Rio" posted at 
http://www.wwtld.org/meetings/Rio/ccNSO_resolution.html ?

How did you arrive at your conclusion?

In your view, why should users support a proposition that calls for three 
top-down appointed members selected by the Nominating Committee to meddle in 
the affairs of this SO?  Do you honestly believe that users are in favor of 
these top-down mechanisms (such as you have in the ALAC)?

By the way, why did you agree to five top-down appointees being placed on the 
ALAC?  ...or do you just automatically agree to everything that ICANN imposes?






--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html