Re: you have missed the point (was RE: [ga] UDRP dead?...)
Title: Brett, The reason expressed by Karl Auerbach is reason enough IMO. If a speedy new registration and resolution for a given domain is required, the use of the 'wildcard' forwarding technique would indeed hamper timely propogation. As an end user, that makes me care enough to make sure you and others know about it. --Sotiris Bret Fausett wrote: So how would you grade the wildcard issue? Is there any reason that end users should care? (I`m hard-pressed for a good reason to care.) -- BretIt seems like the at-large/general network user may take issue with how icann/iana are preforming their primary function "technical administration of the contracted gTLDs" Its time we started grading icann on its ability to manage technical things, thats its mandate with DoC.~~ Bret Fausett http://www.lextext.com/ Hancock, Rothert & Bunshoft, LLP (via Sharp Zaurus Linux PDA) -- This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list. Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message). Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html -- ----------- "The science of jurisprudence regards the state and power as the ancients regarded fire- namely, as something existing absolutely. But for history, the state and power are merely phenomena, just as for modern physics fire is not an element but a phenomenon. >From this fundamental difference between the view held by history and that held by jurisprudence, it follows that jurisprudence can tell minutely how in its opinion power should be constituted and what power- existing immutably outside time- is, but to history's questions about the meaning of the mutations of power in time it can answer nothing." --Leo Tolstoy, "War and Peace"
|