Re: [ga] Who speaks for the ALAC?

[Sotiris Sotiropoulos <sotiris@hermesnetwork.com>]

A ringing endorsement, to be sure.

--Sotiris Sotiropoulos

Esther Dyson wrote:

> Thanks, Vittorio!
>
> Esther
>
> At 06:50 AM 5/30/2003, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 29 May 2003 10:42:33 +0100, you wrote:
>>
>> >At present ALAC is not defending Users. It is acquiescing.
>>
>> I don't think that the ALAC is "acquiescing" to anything - especially
>> if you have a look at some of the things we said in the last weeks. We
>> try to do our best to keep up with all policy proceedings and at the
>> same time go on building the regional representation mechanism (and
>> still have a job, a life and so on); and we want to be constructive,
>> so we usually try to focus our comments on current issues and specific
>> points. But we are not afraid to speak when we think it's necessary.
>> -- 
>> vb.                  [Vittorio Bertola - vb [at] bertola.eu.org]<---
>> -------------------> http://bertola.eu.org/ <-----------------------
>> -- 
>> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>
>
>
> Esther Dyson                    Always make new mistakes!
> chairman, EDventure Holdings
> writer, Release 3.0 (on Website below)
> edyson@edventure.com
> 1 (212) 924-8800    --   fax  1 (212) 924-0240
> 104 Fifth Avenue (between 15th and 16th Streets; 20th floor)
> New York, NY 10011 USA
> http://www.edventure.com
>
> see my new blog (finally!) at
> http://release4.blogspot.com/
>
> Release 1.0 - the first good look
> at technology that matters
>
>
> -- 
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>

-- 
-----------

"The science of jurisprudence regards the state and power as the
ancients regarded fire- namely, as something existing absolutely.
But for history, the state and power are merely phenomena, just as for
modern physics fire is not an element but a phenomenon.

>From this fundamental difference between the view held by history
and that held by jurisprudence, it follows that jurisprudence can tell
minutely how in its opinion power should be constituted and what
power- existing immutably outside time- is, but to history's questions
about the meaning of the mutations of power in time it can answer
nothing."
				     --Leo Tolstoy, "War and Peace"




--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html