<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
[ga] Fwd: WSIS Reloaded! --- Rechange!!
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2003 10:23:36
-0500
To: cctld-discuss@wwtld.org, alac@icann.org, "council"
<council@dnso.org>
From: Erick Iriarte Ahon <faia@amauta.rcp.net.pe>
Subject: WSIS Reloaded! --- Rechange!!
Hi
The WSIS have a new document with some special comments from the
government... The version of June 13 of the documents incorporated the
governments comments and make big changes in the document, it's necessary
to take some position about this comments, and make directs
comments.
The actual version of the documents:
(WSIS/PCIP/DT-1 refined through the intersessional mechanism and
incorporating government contributions received before established
deadline)
44. Management of Internet domain names and addresses: Internet
governance must be
multilateral, intergovernmental, democratic and transparent, supporting
private sector-led industry
self-regulation, taking into account the needs of the public and private
sectors as well as those of the civil society, and respecting
multilingualism. The coordination responsibility at the global level for
root servers, domain names, and Internet Protocol (IP) address assignment
should rest with [a
suitable international, [inter-governmental/inter-governmental]
organization/ a suitable international
organization which represents and is accountable to all stakeholders, and
which has clear
mechanisms for governmental input on issues of public policy]. While the
policy authority for
country code top-level-domain names (ccTLDs) should be the sovereign
right of countries. There
should be appropriate coordination in an international forum on common
ccTLD issues so as to
ensure the stability of the domain name system. Internet naming and
addressing is public issues. (120)
Alternate text 1 for paragraph 44: Internet governance should be
multilateral, [democratic]
and transparent, taking into account the needs of the public and private
sectors as well as
those of the civil society, and respecting
multilingualism.(121)
Alternate text 2 for paragraph 44: The international management of the
Internet should be
democratic, multilateral and transparent. It should secure a fair
distribution of resources, facilitate access for all and ensure a stable
and secure functioning of the Internet. It should
respect geographical diversity and ensure representativeness through the
participation of all
interested States, including public authorities with competence in this
field, of civil society
and the private sector, with due respect to their legitimate
interests.(122)
120 See comments from Australia.
121 Proposed by Canada.
122 Proposed by EU, to be moved to the Action Plan as
modified.
English Version
http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-s/md/03/wsispcip/td/030721/S03-WSISPCIP-030721-TD-GEN-0004!!PDF-E.pdf
-------------------------------
Draft Action Plan
(WSIS/PCIP/DT/2 refined through the intersessional mechanism and
incorporating government contributions received before established
deadline)
SECTION I
33 Internet governance: Internet governance has emerged as a key
issue of the information
society. A transparent multilateral and democratic governance of the
Internet shall constitute the
basis for the development of a global culture of cyber-security. An
[international/intergovernmental] organization should ensure
multilateral, democratic and transparent management of root servers,
domain names and Internet Protocol (IP) address
assignment.(75)
Alternate paragraph 33: Internet governance should be
multilateral and transparent,
taking into account the needs of the public and private sectors as well
as those of the
civil society, and respecting multilingualism. The coordination
responsible for root
servers, domain names and Internet Protocol (IP) address assignment
should rest with a
suitable organization.(76)
33 A The Internet is the base of the information society.
The internet must be
considered a public, international domain. Every country and every person
have the
right to be connected and to take full advantage of the benefits offered
by the internet.
The administration of root servers, domain names and internet protocol
addresses must
be under the responsibility of a multilateral, democratic and transparent
international
organisation. Full access to the mechanisms of internet governance must
be granted to
developing countries.
75 See comments from Australia and New Zealand.
76 Canada
Section II
Observers’ contribution to the draft Action Plan
[25 A] Privacy: Need to:
(....)
- Privacy security studies should be carried on for all main emerging new
technologies, such as IPV6 (Internet Protocol version 6).
[28] Good governance: With the active participation of all stakeholders,
the development of an enabling environment should give due regard to the
rights and obligations of all stakeholders in such areas as freedom of
expression, consumer protection, privacy, security, intellectual property
rights, labour standards, open-source solutions, management of Internet
addresses and domain names while also maintaining economic incentives and
ensuring trust and confidence for business activities.
[33] Internet governance: To widen the participation of all stakeholders
in the global bottom-up policy development and decision making processes,
Task Forces on related public policy and technical issues (Root Server,
Multilingual Domain Names, Internet Security, IPv6, ENUM, Domain Name
Disputes etc.) could be established. Such inter-governmental Task Forces
should promote awareness, distribute knowledge and produce reports which
would help all stakeholders to get a better understanding of the issues
and to cooperate with the relevant bodies like ICANN, IETF, RIRs, ccTLDs
and others.
Proyecto de Plan de Acción
(WSIS/PCIP/DT/2 con las modificaciones del mecanismo interconferencia y
las contribuciones
de los gobiernos recibidas antes del plazo establecido)
SECCIÓN I
33 Gobernanza de Internet : La gestión de Internet es hoy una de
las consideraciones
esenciales de la sociedad de la información. Una gestión transparente,
multilateral y democrática de Internet debería ser la base del desarrollo
de una cultura mundial de ciberseguridad. Una
organización [internacional /intergubernamental] debería garantizar la
gestión multilateral,
democrática y transparente de los servidores de dominio de nivel
superior, los nombres de dominio y la asignación de direcciones del
Protocolo Internet (IP)75
Alternativa para el párrafo 33: La gestión de Internet
debería ser multilateral y
transparente, y debería tomar en consideración las necesidades del sector
público, el
sector privado y la sociedad civil, y respetar el plurilingüismo. Una
organización
competente debería encargarse de la coordinación de los servidores de
nivel superior,
los nombres de dominio y la asignación de direcciones del Protocolo
Internet (IP) . 76
33 A. Internet es la base de la sociedad de la información.
Internet debe ser
considerado como un dominio público internacional. Todos los países y
todas las
personas tienen derecho a conectarse y beneficiarse de las ventajas de
Internet. La
gestión de los servidores de nivel superior, los nombres de dominio y las
direcciones
del Protocolo Internet debe confiarse a una organización internacional
multilateral,
democrática y transparente. Los países en desarrollo deben tener pleno
acceso a los
mecanismos de gestión de Internet.
SECCIÓN II
Contribuciones de los observadores al proyecto de Plan de
Acción
[25A] Privacidad: Es necesario:
(...)
-Deben llevarse a cabo estudios sobre la seguridad de la privacidad para
todas las grandes
tecnologías emergentes, como el IPV6 (Protocolo Internet versión
6).
[28] Gobernanza eficaz: Contando con la participación activa de todos los
interesados, al establecer un entorno habilitador se debe prestar la
debida atención a los derechos y obligaciones de todos los interesados en
esferas tales como la libertad de expresión, la protección del
consumidor, la privacidad, la seguridad, los derechos de propiedad
intelectual, las normas laborales, las soluciones de fuente abierta, la
gestión de los nombres de dominio y direcciones Internet, manteniendo al
mismo tiempo incentivos económicos y generando confianza en las
actividades empresariales.
[33] Gobernanza de Internet: para ampliar la participación de todos los
interesados en el desarrollo global de políticas de abajo a arriba y en
los procesos de toma de decisiones, podrían crearse Grupos de Tareas
Especiales sobre las políticas públicas y las cuestiones técnicas conexas
(servidor de dominio de nivel superior, nombres de dominio multilingües,
seguridad de Internet, IPv6, ENUM, controversias sobre los nombres de
dominio etc.). Dichos grupos de Tareas Especiales intergubernamentales
deberían divulgar y compartir los conocimientos y realizar informes que
ayuden a los interesados a comprender mejor estas cuestiones y a cooperar
con los organismos pertinentes como la ICANN, el IETF, los registros
regionales de Internet, los ccTLD, entre otros.
English Version:
http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-s/md/03/wsispcip/td/030721/S03-WSISPCIP-030721-TD-GEN-0005!!PDF-E.pdf
Spanish Version
http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-s/md/03/wsispcip/td/030721/S03-WSISPCIP-030721-TD-GEN-0005!!PDF-S.pdf
------------------
Erick Iriarte Ahon
LatinoamerICANN (Un Proyecto Alfa-Redi)
http://latinoamericann.derecho.org.ar
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
|