[ga] Why is the GA suddenly the GA list PLUS constituencies?

["Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>]

Since when is the GA comprised of the GA list plus any constituency
members?  It was decided in San Jose that the GA list would be the
sole expression of the GA.

Yet now, for the elections, the definition has been changed.

Again, I propose the GA hold its own election, the purpose of which
will be to present to the NC 3 candidates that meet the requirements
for an ICANN Director.

To proceed differently will be to surrender what little power the GA
has to the NC, thereby completing the disenfranchisement of individuals
in this framework.

-- 
Mark C. Langston	LATEST: ICANN refuses	Let your voice be heard:
mark@bitshift.org  to consider application for       http://www.idno.org
Systems Admin    Constituency status from organized http://www.icann.org
San Jose, CA      individual domain name owners      http://www.dnso.org