<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [nc-budget] FW: Secretariat
I am very comfortable with Erica's analysis and recommendations including
the priorities she suggested. My personal feeling is that objective #4 is
ultimately the most important and we should hire someone who will be able to
do that job. Hopefully Objectives 1 and 3 could eventually be offloaded to
someone else as resources allow.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: Elisabeth Porteneuve [mailto:Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr]
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 4:37 AM
To: Erica.Roberts@melbourneit.com.au; nc-budget@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [nc-budget] FW: Secretariat
Erica, I eventually understand what's wrong with your posting
-- you shall change
To: "nc Budget List (E-mail)" <majordomo@dnso.org>,
into To: nc-budget@dnso.org
Majordomo is just for subscribing, once and no more !
Thank you for posting this full copy.
Best,
Elisabeth
--
> From owner-nc-budget@dnso.org Fri Aug 25 09:26 MET 2000
> Message-ID: <1595534C9032D411AECE00508BC766FB869421@mercury.mit>
> From: Erica Roberts <Erica.Roberts@melbourneit.com.au>
> To: "nc Budget List (E-mail)" <majordomo@dnso.org>,
> "Nc-Budget (E-mail)"
> <nc-budget@dnso.org>,
> "nc Budget List (E-mail 2)" <Majordomo@dnso.org>
> Subject: [nc-budget] FW: Secretariat
> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 17:26:27 +1000
> MIME-Version: 1.0
>
> I'm sorry if this is spamming everbody but I got back an unusual message
> from majordomo dnso org - small extract below - and I'm not sure whether
the
> message got thru.
>
> >>>> Hi Chuck,
> **** Command 'hi' not recognized.
> >>>>
> >>>> I am comfortable with your detailed spec for the Secretariat. My
only
> **** Command 'i' not recognized.
> >>>> concern is that it is possibly too complete and that the job as
> specified
> **** Command 'concern' not recognized.
> >>>> is beyond the scope of one person. I think we are agreed that the
> total job
> **** Command 'is' not recognized.
>
>
> erica-----Original Message-----
> From: Erica Roberts
> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 5:00 PM
> To: Chuckg@Netsol. Com (E-mail)
> Cc: nc Budget List (E-mail 2)
> Subject: Secretariat
>
>
> Hi Chuck,
>
> I am comfortable with your detailed spec for the Secretariat. My only
> concern is that it is possibly too complete and that the job as specified
> is beyond the scope of one person. I think we are agreed that the total
job
> probably is beyond the scope of a single person but that we should hire a
> senior person first and then allow that person to advise on what other
> support is required and how that can be delivered. Funding is clearly a
> critical issue here! Given that this remains an issue, I suggest we
> indicate in covering documentation that we recognise that the secretariat
> task may be beyond the scope of a single person and that any bids should
> prioritise taskings so that additional staff can be progressive hired as
> required and as funding becomes available.
>
> My assessment of the priorities would be Objectives 1, 2 and 4. I see
> Objective 4 as (at least initially) a stretch (or longer term) objective.
> The specific job responsibilities for Ob. 4 will need to be prioitised
with
> time frames and resource costs attached.
>
> It would be good if we can get sign off on this tonight and agree on the
> selection criteria we intend to use.
>
> erica
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|