<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [nc-budget] question without answer so far
why would we want to replace her. she had a brief "transition" problem...
she has been a valuable contributor to this group and should be givern the
benefit of a doubt.
ken stubbs
----- Original Message -----
From: Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@netsol.com>
To: 'Peter de Blanc' <pdeblanc@usvi.net>; 'Dany Vandromme'
<vandrome@renater.fr>; Cochetti, Roger <rogerc@netsol.com>
Cc: <nc-budget@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 8:08 AM
Subject: RE: [nc-budget] question without answer so far
> Erica is participating again. Why the rush to replace her?
>
> Chuck
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter de Blanc [mailto:pdeblanc@usvi.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 4:04 AM
> To: 'Dany Vandromme'; 'Cochetti, Roger'
> Cc: nc-budget@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [nc-budget] question without answer so far
>
>
> Greetings all...
>
> I would suggest that this (situation) be treated as business in the
private
> sector would. The person is absent, and the return is unknown- both as to
> when and as to if.
>
> One, or more persons on the committee need to carry on (or re-do) the
work.
>
> peter de Blanc
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nc-budget@dnso.org [mailto:owner-nc-budget@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Dany Vandromme
> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 2:22 AM
> To: Cochetti, Roger
> Cc: nc-budget@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [nc-budget] question without answer so far
>
>
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Cochetti, Roger wrote:
>
> > I think we should stand by until we get a clarification from Erica on
her
> > plans for the Names Council Budget Committee's Subcommittee on
> > Recruitment/Selection of professional staff.
> -
> Hope this will happen soon. If not, the nc-budget work will be
> significantly delayed for a reason even external to the group itself.
> What are we going to present as report to the call on the 21st?
> -
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dany Vandromme [mailto:vandrome@renater.fr]
> > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 2:39 PM
> > To: nc-budget@dnso.org
> > Subject: [nc-budget] question without answer so far
> >
> >
> >
> > In a previous mail, I pointed out the possible problem of the
> > participation of Erica to the nc-budget subgroup, since at the time of
the
> > NC vote, it was mentionned that she was not appointed by Melbourne IT.
> >
> > I am not ready (neither willing) to discuss about the topic of Erica
> > having or not the legitimity to work in the dnso on behalf of the
> > constituency, but rather remind that during the last confcall of the
> > nc-budget, Erica was in charge of providing further element for the
> > secretariat recruitment process.
> >
> > Later, Erica did send a mail providing her new affiliation information,
> > but nothing about the expected task for the sub-group.
> >
> > As we are already thinking to present some nc-budget report to the DNSO,
I
> > am wondering how to proceed?
> >
> > I suggested to take over Erica for the task, but except the
> > misunderstanding of Chuck, no answer, no comment....
> >
> > Are you really willing to see that subgroup getting to some achievement
or
> > is it just worth to stand by?
> >
> > Comments?
> >
> > Dany
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Dany VANDROMME | Directeur du GIP RENATER
> >
> > Reseau National de Telecommunications
> > pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche
> >
> > | ENSAM
> > Tel : +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30 | 151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
> > Fax : +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31 | 75013 Paris
> > E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr | FRANCE
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dany VANDROMME | Directeur du GIP RENATER
>
> Reseau National de Telecommunications
> pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche
>
> | ENSAM
> Tel : +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30 | 151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
> Fax : +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31 | 75013 Paris
> E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr | FRANCE
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|