<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[nc-budget] MEETING OF NC BUDGET COMMITTEE IN BUCHAREST
Since we did not complete our work during the last Budget Committee
teleconference, I have asked Jennifer Boggess to try and schedule a
face-to-face meeting of the Committee in Bucharest prior to the Names
Council meeting. She will attempt to schedule the meeting at a time that
would be convenient for those Committee members who will not be in Bucharest
to call into the meeting.
We have two items on our agenda, as far as I know:
(1) The review of financial results for the Year-to-Date [see attached
report]; and
(2) A new invoice that we have just now received from ICANN management for
$9274.36. This would reimburse ICANN for DNSO-related expenses that they
have incurred since last year. Since the amount exceeds $5,000, we need to
make a recommendation to the Council on this item.
Let me know if you have any other agenda items.
Roger Cochetti
Chair
Names Council Budget Committee
-----Original Message-----
From: DNSO Secretariat [mailto:DNSO.Secretariat@dnso.org]
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 5:48 PM
To: philip.sheppard@aim.be; rcochetti@verisign.com; cgomes@verisign.com;
Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr; gcore@wanadoo.fr
Subject: Updated Management Accounts to 31 May 2002
To: Roger Cochetti
NC Budget Committee Chair,
Paris, 14 June 2002
Dear Roger,
We updated the Management Accounts to 31 May 2002 (8 months
of DNSO Secretariat services) with information provided by Diane
Schroeder.
Under expenditure all items but teleconferences are well within budget.
In total we are $5767 under the total figures shown in the budget.
However, as already pointed out, the intensive usage of teleconferencing
related to ICANN Reform may well diminish it.
Best regards,
Glen de Saint Gery
Elisabeth Porteneuve
-
Attached:
Excel spreadsheet file DNSOSEC.ManagAccounts-upd.31may02
including 3 parts: ManagAccounts, KeepingRecords and AdoptedBudget.
DNSOSEC.ManagAccounts-upd.31may02.xls
Dear Roger,
Yes, these are Names Council teleconferences and I have checked each one and
added the length of the teleconference and number of participants to the
spread sheet.
I will double check with Diane.
Due to the increased number of teleconferences, far from the original one
per month, the amount has increased. This is the first time that I have a
list of the actual costs per call.
I will assure Diane that she will be paid and suggest that I do the same
with the Wcom bills in the future as I do with AFNIC and mine, send an
invoice to the Budget committee.
The Marina del Rey was my hotel bill in November, when I asked you kindly if
ICANN could pay it as at that stage I had received no money yet.
I have however paid the bill yesterday with my credit card as I did not want
extra expense to lag on and if you are in agreement, I will claim it back at
the end of the month if you agree.
I hope this gives you the information you require.
I will send a copy of this to Chuck too.
Kind regards
Glen
----- Original Message -----
From: Cochetti, Roger <RCochetti@verisign.com>
To: 'DNSO Secretariat' <DNSO.Secretariat@dnso.org>
Cc: <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 1:30 PM
Subject: RE: DNSO expenses owed to ICANN
>
> Glen-
>
> This is the first time that I have heard about these expenses. I assume
> that they are all for the cost of teleconferences that you have not paid
for
> directly.
>
> Please review the list with Diane and verify the accuracy of each item so
> that you have some idea what expenses were covered. Then, please report to
> the Budget Committee on what these expenses were for (e.g. "all of
> teleconferences of Names Council Meetings", or whatever the actual
> justification)
>
> You can assure Dianne, and I will as well, that as soon as the invoices
are
> examined and explained, the Budget Committee will review them. In this
> case, however, the amount exceeds our $5,000 limit so the Budget Committee
> will make a recommendation to the Council for the prompt payment of these.
>
> Also please assure Dianne that we are quite willing to enter into
reasonable
> arrangements with ICANN in the future for the prompt reimbursement of
ICANN
> for any expenses that the DNSO authorizes them to incur for us.
>
> Roger
>
> P.S. Could you also double check the Budget Committee's listserv to
ensure
> that Ken Stubbs is on it. He called the other day to complain that he was
> not getting meeting notices. He may use more than one e-mail address and
> the BC listserv may use an old address. Please test it with him to make
> sure it works. Thanks
>
>
>
>
> Roger J. Cochetti
> Senior Vice-President & Chief Policy Officer
> VeriSign
> (202) 973-6600
> rcochetti@verisign.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DNSO Secretariat [mailto:DNSO.Secretariat@dnso.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 7:30 PM
> To: philip.sheppard@aim.be; rcochetti@verisign.com; cgomes@verisign.com;
> Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr; gcore@wanadoo.fr
> Subject: DNSO expenses owed to ICANN
>
>
> To: Roger Cochetti
> NC Budget Committee Chair,
>
>
> Paris, 14 June 2002
>
> Dear Roger,
>
> Diane Schroeder, ICANN Financial Officer, is asking the Names Council
> to reimburse several bills, which has been paid by ICANN between
> December 2001 and April 2002 to cover the DNSO expenses.
> The total amount is $9274.36, details are given in the attached file.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Glen de Saint Gery
>
> PJ:
> Y2002.Jan-Apr.DNSO-owed-to-ICANN-invoice.doc
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Diane Schroeder <schroeder@icann.org>
> To: Glen van Oudenhove de Saint Gery <gcore@wanadoo.fr>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:43 PM
> Subject: ICANN Bills
>
>
> Dear Glen - attached is a spreadsheet of the current amounts owed to
> ICANN by the DNSO. This now totals $9274.36. As I explained in
> an earlier e:mail, we need to have a procedure established for these
> to be submitted and paid. I can provide backup for each call and
> the hotel bill if needed.
> Could you please talk to the appropriate people and let me know how
> these will be handled. Our fiscal year ends June 30 2002 and these
> need to be paid before that date. If anyone has any questions,
> I'd be glad to answer them.
>
> This will continue to happen on a monthly basis since you are using
> the WorldCom account. I appreciate the help. It is important to
> resolve this issue if the DNSO is going to continue to use ICANN
> accounts.
>
> Thank you. Diane
>
>
To: Roger Cochetti
NC Budget Committee Chair,
Paris, 14 June 2002
Dear Roger,
Diane Schroeder, ICANN Financial Officer, is asking the Names Council
to reimburse several bills, which has been paid by ICANN between
December 2001 and April 2002 to cover the DNSO expenses.
The total amount is $9274.36, details are given in the attached file.
Best regards,
Glen de Saint Gery
PJ:
Y2002.Jan-Apr.DNSO-owed-to-ICANN-invoice.doc
----- Original Message -----
From: Diane Schroeder <schroeder@icann.org>
To: Glen van Oudenhove de Saint Gery <gcore@wanadoo.fr>
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:43 PM
Subject: ICANN Bills
Dear Glen - attached is a spreadsheet of the current amounts owed to
ICANN by the DNSO. This now totals $9274.36. As I explained in
an earlier e:mail, we need to have a procedure established for these
to be submitted and paid. I can provide backup for each call and
the hotel bill if needed.
Could you please talk to the appropriate people and let me know how
these will be handled. Our fiscal year ends June 30 2002 and these
need to be paid before that date. If anyone has any questions,
I'd be glad to answer them.
This will continue to happen on a monthly basis since you are using
the WorldCom account. I appreciate the help. It is important to
resolve this issue if the DNSO is going to continue to use ICANN
accounts.
Thank you. Diane
Y2002.Jan-Apr.DNSO-owed-to-ICANN-invoice.doc
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|