RE: [nc-intake]

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@netsol.com>]

I'm still contemplating the idea of restricting proxies to NC members except
when no NC members are able to participate directly.  This would create a
unique situation for the gTLD Registry Constituency because we are the only
constituency that has just one member.  That should change in the future but
we are not there yet.

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: R.Gaetano@iaea.org [mailto:R.Gaetano@iaea.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2000 5:47 AM
To: nc-intake@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [nc-intake] 


I forgot:

About the planning, a yearly planning is OK, but since things evolve fast, I
think that the meeting calendar should be reviewed quarterly.
Something like the calendar for Quarter (n) approved by 15 of the last month
of Quarter (n-1).

About the proxies, a clear decision must be taken on whether a proxy can be
given to a non-NC representative. The issue has been raised already with
NonCom proxies, and may well happen again.
For this as well I am happy with Caroline's proposal.

Regards
Roberto