[nc-intake] Re: Agenda for the NC meeting 19 October

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@revenue.com>]

thanks for the input but i believe very strongly that 24 hours is,
practically, not a  long enough time to give anyone to respond so from now
on i feel we need to have 72 hours . if that time period is not considered
practical enough by the intake committee then i will take it up during the
council session.

i will be adding another 10 minutes to the icann staff time as they need to
bring us up=to-dat on the finances and we need their input on the LA
meeting.

we also need an agenda item dealing with discussions on hopw to deal with
1. openess with respect to teleconferences
2. taping & making available by internet access the names council meetings
(this would eliminate the need for real-time listen -in ports (which were
not provided at the last meeting by the way)
3. i would also assume that there is a necessity for an item 14 "ANB" (any
new business) or is this system designed to avoid this normal practice
4. what about a report from the CCTLD"s what is their current status with
the names council... is dennis in, out, up, down, or what ? do they have a
new representative

i may have more still so please dont consider this response as the final
response.

best wishes

ken

----- Original Message -----
From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
To: "Ken Stubbs Reg" <kstubbs@corenic.org>
Cc: "DNSO Intake" <nc-intake@dnso.org>; "Elisabeth DNSO Sec"
<Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 3:09 AM
Subject: Agenda for the NC meeting 19 October


> Ken,
> In accordance with the new procedure please find below the agenda proposed
> by the Intake Commitee for the meeting 19 October.
> You have 24 hours to make any changes before Elisabeth is obliged to send
it
> out to all the NC.
> Reports referenced in the agenda have a further 7 days before they must be
> submitted.
> Philip pp IC
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> 1. Approval of the agenda (Ken Stubbs) - 2 min
>
> 2. Approval of the summary of the meeting 21 September (Ken Stubbs) - 3
min
>
> 3. Matters arising (not forming part of this agenda) (Ken Stubbs) - 5 min
>
> 4. NC proxy proposal (Paul Kane) REQUIRES NC DECISION - 10 min
> http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/200010xx.NCproxy-vote.v1.html, Version 1,
xx
> October 2000, TO BE PROVIDED
>
> 5. Preparation for LA physical meeting Tuesday 14 November, Marina del
Rey,
> California : administrative (Paul Kane), agenda (NC business plan 2001)
(Ken
> Stubbs/Erica Roberts/IC) - 15 min
>
> 6. Proposed dates for next meetings: REQUIRES NC DECISION (Ken Stubbs) - 5
> min)
> Teleconference, Thursday 14 December
> Teleconference, Thursday 25 January
>
> 7. Submission of Meetings Conduct Report from Intake Committee
(P.Sheppard)
> REQUIRES NC DECISION - 15 min
>
> 8. Review Committee status report:
> Version 2.0 sent on 29 September to the NC and NC-Review
> http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-review/Arc00/msg00053.html,
> sent to Constituencies and GA  (Theresa Swinehart) - 10 min
>
> 9. Proposal for an NC report on TLDs and intellectual property
(Cochetti) -
> 10 min
>
> 10. Budget Committee - status report (Roger Cochetti) - 5 min
>
> 11. Independent Review Panel nomination committee proposals - status
report
> (K.Stubbs/C.Chicoine) - 5 min
>
> 12. Update on new TLDs (ICANN staff) - 5 min
>
> 13. AOB
>
>
>