Re: [nc-intake] External speaker for LA
Philip and all,
Since I participated in this DNSO/ICANN
process,
this is the most confusing part I have been
facing.
Who can decide this is going to be
- a forum for advocating any
constituency's position
- a ballanced open
forum
Please listen to the other side of constiteuncy and
world, too.
I am here quoting Michael Froomkin's concern whose
view
can be shared with many group of people or
constituencies
who have not been consulted with in this process.
> I think it's essential to balance WIPO's comments
with something. Their
> current process is designed to learn from the first one -- by suppressing > dissenting voices. They have done little to no outreach to the public > interest sector, disbanded the only internal source of alternate voices > (the advisory experts group of which I was a part). They are currently > scheduling no public meetings in Western Europe or the USA -- the places > where they might encounter (last time did encouter) opposition to their > plans. > > Frankly, the entire process appears to be rigged this time -- or should I > say, even better rigged than last time. Until there is a gurantee NC can have a balanced
presentation during the NC
meeting, I hereby express
my objection to Francis' presentation. Thanks,
YJ
|