<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[nc-intake] Re: [council] Input for the NC agenda
>Fellow NC members:
>
>I have been innundated by e-mails and telephone requests from the media
>asking about our (ICANN) "official response" to the Fromkin report, as
>presented in the Duke University Law Review. That report raises the question
>of the legality of ICANN vis a vis US law and policy.
>
>
>I would suggest that we (the NC) petition the Board to direct the ICANN
>staff to prepare an "Official statement" on the subject, so that, when and
>if asked, we can all "sing to the same music".
>
>Peter de Blanc
I support Peter proposal asking for clarification made formally by ICANN staff.
Furthermore, I would like to have on the Dec 19th NC meeting a point
for the creation/approval of the DNSO review working group, as
suggested by YJ. That point needs also a straight fixing, without any
further delay.
I even encourage YJ to start working on that right away. Based on the
existing experience of earlier working group, it may be possible to
have a WG charter for approval at the NC next meeting.
Yours
Dany
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dany VANDROMME | Directeur du GIP RENATER
Reseau National pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche
| ENSAM
Tel : +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30 | 151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
Fax : +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31 | 75013 Paris
E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr | FRANCE
--------------------------------------------------------------------
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|