Re: [nc-intake] Intake Committee - new chair

["Paul M. Kane" <Paul.Kane@reacto.com>]

I too am in favour of the Chair being on the Intake Committee.

I'm willing to be the IC Coordinator (Chair) - working with the NC Chairman to
ensure the agenda is discussed in the IC and is available in plenty of time NC
members.....

Best regards to all

Paul

"Chicoine, Caroline G." wrote:

> I am for Philip staying on as a member and for Paul taking his place.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philip Sheppard [mailto:philip.sheppard@aim.be]
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 5:01 AM
> To: nc-intake@dnso.org
> Subject: [nc-intake] Intake Committee - new chair
> Importance: High
>
> Dear Intake Committee,
> now that I am NC chair for the next six months we need to consider my
> existing role as chair of Intake Committee.
>
> Q1: Is it sensible to have the NC chair as a MEMBER of the IC? Answer I
> suggest is yes.
> Q2. Should the NC chair lead the IC as well ?
> Advantages: fulfils chair's role.
> Disadvantages: does not spread the workload.
> Does not ensure an agenda appears should there be a lazy chair in the
> future!
>
> So, I propose that I stay as a MEMBER of the IC and that we find another
> chair.
>
> I note Paul Kane volunteered earlier and has now been proposed by YJ. So let
> me second his nomination.
>
> Would the other members of the IC please indicate their support or otherwise
> within the next 24 hours?
>
> Philip.