[nc-intake] Re: Review WG-D's status report in Feb. 8 meeting.

["YJ Park (MINC)" <yjpark@minc.org>]

Thank you, Bret.

This reminds me of WG-E's report which has been put aside due to 
"public comment" period arguement.

I propose WG-E's report which has been held for more than five 
months be discussed and NC make its recommendation to the Board 
in the next NC teleconference on Feb. 26.

YJ

> A draft report to the NC was sent to WG-D members today. As soon as WG
> members have signed off on it and upon the advice of Theresa about how to
> begin the public comment period, we will forward it directly to the NC.
> 
> If you wish to review the latest draft, it is here:
> 
>   http://www.lextext.com/NCReport.pdf
> 
>   http://www.lextext.com/wgdv4.pdf
> 
>        -- Bret
> 
> 
> YJ Park (MINC) wrote:
> > We also noted Caroline's suggestion to let WG-D come up with its
> > final report to facilitate WG model in the DNSO. I do agree.
> > We need some format to let WG function as it has been designed.
> 
>