ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-intake]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [nc-intake] Draft NC agenda Oct 11


Hi Philip and all:

Well...please, and if it is fine for all of you, add
in the agenda the issue about Communication between
NC/DNSO and DNSO Board members.

Also I want to clarify the follwing point:

> 10. Use of ccTLDs as generics - Vany 
The issue that I wanted to deal about was about
companies that are offering domains under TLDs not
created by ICANN, using a technolgy that allows them
to masquerade existing domains to resolve domains
under such TLDs.  I think that the NC should say a
word in this issue because all DNS sectors represented
in DNSO are affected.  And if even this is not under
the power of ICANN to stop it, well, then at least
that make that ICANN publicly make an statement about
it with recommendations to the pertaining bodies that
can deal about such activity better.  To be sincere,
personally, I think is a fraud simply because the day
that ICANN decides to grant the registry of a new TLD
to a company different from the one that has being
offering such TLD...the ones who registered domains
names under such TLD simply loose the domain and
probably the money.

I think this is a subject very different from use
ccTLDs as generics, or lets say, better: marketing
ccTLDs as generics.   This was the concern of the .BIZ
Registry in Montevideo.

Best Regards
Vany


=====
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales
Information Technology Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
http://www.sdnp.org.pa e-mail: vany@sdnp.org.pa

Go to http://www.getpaid4.com/cgi-bin/emailpanel.cgi?userid=659401 to receive FREE newsletters via email!
Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?sheharhore to make $$$ using YOUR OWN computer and sigining subscribers in YOUR OWN emails!

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone.
http://phone.yahoo.com


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>