RE: [nc-org] RE: registrar relations

["Guillermo Carey C." <gcarey@carey.cl>]

Thank you Milton. On this point we have heard only a few positions of the TF
members. Maybe others could comment. If there are no comments by tomorrow
noon and we have not been able to have a clear view of the TF on this point
then I agree to proceed as suggested. 

Thanks

Guillermo


-----Mensaje original-----
De: Milton Mueller [mailto:Mueller@syr.edu]
Enviado el: Miércoles, 26 de Septiembre de 2001 10:33
Para: gcarey@carey.cl; nc-org@dnso.org
Asunto: [nc-org] RE: registrar relations


Guillermo:

I understand your points and I understand Ken's too.
In the interest of moving forward, might I suggest that the
Task Force NOT adopt any position on that, but simply 
craft a few questions about how to approach it for
the public comment period? 

Personally, I favor giving the newORG entity the ability to
exert some control over the marketing of ORG by registrars.
But I DON'T want to see those marketing guidelines 
transmogrify into costly and difficult to police ex-ante
restrictions on who can register in ORG.

I will draft some language to put into the public comment
document. OK? We need to be ready by the end of this week.


>>> "Guillermo Carey C." <gcarey@carey.cl> 09/25/01 04:46PM >>>
Therefore, certain policies should be included that should bond those 
entities that will market this name space.