Re: [nc-org] Re: Final (v. 3.2) ORG Policy Statement

[Marc Schneiders <marc@schneiders.org>]

I support this, with Milton's change.

On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, at 12:46 [=GMT-0400], Milton Mueller wrote:

> I like this except would prefer to substitute the word 
> "marketing" for "domain" in the next to last sentence.
> 
> >>> ck@nrm.se 10/02/01 08:20AM >>>
> > Cary Karp wrote:
> > The notion of permitting third party complaint about the diligence
> > with which the SO is upholding its charter is entirely reasonable.
> > The purpose of the CEDRP is to provide such a mechanism.
> >
> > MM ===>
> > Another thought on this: it would seem that such complaints
> > are not against the domain name registrant, but a registrar
> > who violates the marketing policy. Could this be a way to
> > square the unrestricted/marketing focus circle?
> 
> Suggestion:
> 
> "Should not adopt, or be required by ICANN to adopt, dispute
> initiation procedures that could result in the cancellation of
> domain delegations. If it can be implemented in adherence with this
> principle, the newly introduced CEDRP may be adapted to ensure SO
> and registrar diligence in the maintenance of domain policy. The
> UDRP would apply as per #4 below."
> 
> /Cary
> 
> 
> 
>