ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-org]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [nc-org] Comments are in.


On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, at 12:14 [=GMT-0500], Milton Mueller wrote:

> The deadline for comments on the dot ORG 
> policy has passed. There was a small number
> of comments, mostly supportive. 
> 
> The two areas where modifications might be needed are:
> 
> 1. The proposal might contain more detailed guidelines
> regarding the sponsoring organization and its methods,
> as proposed in the comments of Thomas Roessler
> http://www.dnso.org/dnso/dnsocomments/comments-dotorg/Arc01/msg00002.html

I have some problem with this, since so far we have come to the
agreement, that we should not tighten matters too much in this
regard. I would like to hear other members of the TF about this.

> 2. The proposal might be modified to make it clear
> that the sponsoring organisation retains the right 
> to make stipulations regarding the practices of the
> registrar. The statement explicitly asked for comment
> on this and there were no comments against
> making such stipulations, and there were several
> comments in favor. (Bailey, Ress, Pruett)

I agree with this.

> 3. There was also a comment asking the statement
> to make sure that the new sponsoring org 
> "keep the cost of registration as low as possible,
> consistent with the need to provide effective service." 

I agree with this even more.


-- 
Marc@Schneiders.ORG

> 
> 
> 
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>