Re: [nc-org] wrap up

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@digitel.net>]

i have one more minor concern milton, sorry for the late hour but i note
that you accepted suggestions yesterday from guillermo.

i am concerned about the reference in the policy statement re: registrar
accreditation and suggest that you reinforce the fact that all ICANN
accredited registrars would continue to be able to affiliate with dot org
after the transfer.

as the registrars are currently covered in the agreement with dot org, i
also feel that no new financial burdens or other "barriers to entry" should
be assumed by them  or imposed on them re: future accreditation to the dot
org registry.

best wishes

ken stubbs
p.s. i was travelling yesterday and had no conncetivity, hence the request
this am


----- Original Message -----
From: "Milton Mueller" <Mueller@syr.edu>
To: <nc-org@dnso.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 9:09 AM
Subject: [nc-org] wrap up


> OK, it seems that this idea (of NCDNHC
> serving as part of the review mechanism)
> won't fly. I will abandon it and follow
> the suggested path of having each
> constituency prepare their own comments
> on the applications.
>
> That seems to be the only feature of the
> final policy that attracted criticism and
> comment. So I will forward version 4.1
> of the policy statement to the Names
> Council and its chair in time for
> consideration at the December
> teleconference.
>
> Pleasure working with you all!
> I guess we will reconvene briefly
> in early 2002 to review the RFP ICANN
> staff prepares. Until then,
>
> --MM
>
>
>
>