RE: [nc-org] wrap up

["Guillermo Carey C." <gcarey@carey.cl>]

I am OK with your suggestion and interpretation. I believe that the rest of
the group share this view.



> Guillermo Carey
> Carey y Cía. Ltda.
> Tel.: (56-2) 365 7284
> Fax: (56-2) 3657319
> 
> Visite nuestra página WEB www.carey.cl
> 
> La información contenida en esta transmisión es confidencial, y no puede
ser usada, por otras personas que su(s) destinatario(s). El uso no
autorizado de la información contenida en esta transmisión puede ser
sancionado criminalmente de conformidad con el Código Penal Chileno. Si ha
recibido esta transmisión por error, por favor destrúyala y notifique al
remitente telefónicamente, con cobro revertido o vía e-mail.
> 
> The information contained in this transmission is privileged, and may not
be used, by any person other than its addressee(s). Unauthorized use of the
information contained in this transmission may be punished under the Chilean
Criminal Code. If received in error, please destroy and notify the sender by
calling collect or by e-mail.
> 


-----Mensaje original-----
De: Milton Mueller [mailto:Mueller@syr.edu]
Enviado el: Miércoles, 28 de Noviembre de 2001 18:57
Para: gcarey@carey.cl; nc-org@dnso.org
Asunto: RE: [nc-org] wrap up


Guillermo:
I think it is a very clear part of existing language
and existing understandings that Section 3 is
fully consistent with current requirements for
accurate contact info and complaints about 
false contact data. 

I have no problem with the language
modification you propose in the first bullet:

"· Must not attempt to impose ANY NEW prior 
restrictions on people or organizations attempting 
to register names"

I will make this change.

But the second one is totally unnecessary, 
and somewhat awkward. The current language 
already clearly states "NEW" dispute initiation
procedures. By your own statement, a complaint 
of false contact data can ALREADY trigger 
revocation of a registration. So I see no way
that the existing language could be 
construed to rule out such practices. Also,
Section 6 already explicitly references 
adherence to existing contact info policies.

OK?