Re: [nc-org] Way forward

[Marc Schneiders <marc@schneiders.org>]

Milton,

This seems a sensible way forward. Thank you. I am rather angry at the
way in which some people outside of the TF tried to sink the draft of
the boat that we came up with. Esp. since they set up the main
criteria for the boat, which were contradictory in itself (given
that the boat has been sailing for a while). I am willing to continue
to praticpate in whatever manner I can. But I refuse to yield to staff
trying to oust all proper input from those who should be advising the
Board, like the NC. Yes, and the bottom process thing also.

M

On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, at 12:16 [=GMT-0500], Milton Mueller wrote:

> 
> Here is my proposal for a way forward.
> 
> 1. The starting point of all our deliberations is 
> that the policy bargain embodied in the original
> TF report was acceptable to all parties.
> 
> 2. Therefore, the trick is to find a way to force
> the SAME essential policy guidance into the
> sponsored or unsponsored model.
> 
> 3. We are aiming at a teleconference Jan 3rd, 
> although that date is still tentative. It may make
> sense to push it back to the next week.
> 
> 4. By the end of this week, I will submit outlines
> of how the original report could be modified to 
> adapt it to both models: sponsored, restricted (S,R) 
> or unsponsored, unrestricted (U,U).
> 
> 5. We will beat up on these proposals for about ten days
> (which unfortunately includes the holiday week in this 
> part of the world). If a consensus is evident, we 
> may not need the telecon. If it is not, we will hold it.
> 
>