RE: [nc-plan] Names Council Business Plan 2001-2002 Consultation

["Peter de Blanc" <pdeblanc@usvi.net>]

Thank you, Dany!

Happy New Year!

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nc-plan@dnso.org [mailto:owner-nc-plan@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
Dany Vandromme
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 11:51 AM
To: Peter de Blanc; 'NC plan'
Subject: Re: [nc-plan] Names Council Business Plan 2001-2002
Consultation


on 7/01/01 13:15, Peter de Blanc at pdeblanc@usvi.net wrote:

> Dany and colleagues:
>
> Under # 2,
>
> "> Make recommendations regarding same. Timeframe: 2001.
> -
> Not clear. Recommendations about what? to who?"
>
> Any review and evaluation we make should include recommendations to the
> ICANN Board. Such review may include, but is not limited to
> Further Studies,
> Advice as to whether to take a "more liberal" or "more conservative" stand
> on proliferation of new TLDs, etc.
-
OK for me (I probably had wording problem). Sounds better that way.
-
>
> as for
>
> "Review and and  evaluate the selection
> criteria and pass-through costs for additional new applicants for new
> gTLDs."
>
> I am referring to the $ 50,000 application fee.
-
That's a good point
I agree
-
>
> peter
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dany Vandromme [mailto:vandrome@renater.fr]
> Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 7:13 AM
> To: Peter de Blanc; 'NC plan'
> Subject: Re: [nc-plan] Names Council Business Plan 2001-2002
> Consultation
>
>
> I agree partially with Peter.
> See my comment below:
> DV
>
>
> on 6/01/01 6:44, Peter de Blanc at pdeblanc@usvi.net wrote:
>
>> I'd like to propose adding/modifying  to Objectives:
>>
>> # 1. "UDRP. a) Review and evaluate the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy
> and
>> propose changes for consideration by the ICANN Board. Timeframe: 2001."
>>
>> b) "Consider need for further revisions in the light of the 2000 - 2001
>> WIPO  process vs: opposing positions to WIPO process looking at issues
>> involving domain names and property other than trademarks. Timeframe:
> 2001"
> -
> AGREE
> -
>>
>> # 2, TLDs "Review and and  evaluate the proof of concept of the new TLD
>> registries with respect to their impact on net users and the creation of
a
>> stable
>> expanded domain name system with high user confidence.
> -
> AGREE
> -
>> Make recommendations regarding same. Timeframe: 2001.
> -
> Not clear. Recommendations about what? to who?
> -
>
>> Review and and  evaluate the selection
>> criteria and pass-through costs for additional new applicants for new
>> gTLDs."
> -
> This should be more specifically stated by addressing the role of DNSO,
i.e.
> Domain Name policy guidance to ICANN. Pass-through costs arguments may be
> seen as related to contractual relationships between ICANN and
> registries....
> -
>>
>> 4 ccTLDs.
>>
>> Is this not covered under number (3) ? If not, let's not use the word
>> "harmonization" because that implies that there is mandated  a dispute
>> resolution policy.
> -
> I would prefer to keep the word "harmonization". not in the sense of an
> imposed model, but for transparency reasons.
> -
>>
>> "Monitor and advise the Board on the issues of
>> dispute resolution and WhoIs policies within ccTLDs. Timeframe: 2001"
>>
>> peter de Blanc
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-nc-plan@dnso.org [mailto:owner-nc-plan@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
>> Erica Roberts
>> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 6:18 PM
>> To: Philip Sheppard; NC plan
>> Subject: Re: [nc-plan] Names Council Business Plan 2001-2002
>> Consultation
>>
> -
> Looking forward for your comments
> Dany
> -
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER
>
> Reseau National de Telecommunications
> pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche
>
> |  ENSAM
> Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     |  151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
> Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     |  75013 Paris
> E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr |  FRANCE
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER

                Reseau National de Telecommunications
         pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche

                                  |  ENSAM
Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     |  151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     |  75013 Paris
E-mail: Dany.Vandromme@renater.fr |  FRANCE
--------------------------------------------------------------------