[nc-review] Worried

[R.Gaetano@iaea.org]

Hi.

I have to confess that I am getting worried about this situation.

This Task Force is essentially silent, and this silence is counterbalanced
by a lot of activity on some lists, for instance the GA and NonCom.
If I had to draw conclusions, the obvious one is that this Task Force is not
interested in getting the ball moving: maybe people are more absorbed by the
election of the DNSO-selected ICANN Director. OTOH, there is a lot of
interest "outside".

I propose that the draft report of YJ, that had *zero* comments in two weeks
on this list, be passed to the NC with the recommandation to create as soon
as possible an open Working Group. A lot of people are just waiting for this
Working Group to start to propose their ideas and discuss the matter. What
are we waiting for?

In any case, in Yokohama this was the proposal of the NC: to create the Task
Force, to define the charter of the Working Group, and let the Working Group
discuss the matter.

BTW, let me take this chance to add a point to the shopping list of the
future WG: a unique DNSO Voting Registry.
The nomination of the DNSO Director, once again, create difficulties of
verification, because most of the Constituencies are unable to provide a
list of who is "part of the Constituency" and therefore allowed to
nominate/endorse. To run any serious ballot, or endorsement, or any voting
activity, in a situation where the list of voters is not defined, is
impossible.
The situation has to be corrected, once these elections over, with an
official list of who can endorse/vote. Of course, considering the principle
that "every member of any Constituency is a member of the GA", the best
solution is to ask everybody, in the Constituencies, WGs, etc. to join the
GA Voting Registry.
But I assume that the solution has to be indcated by the WG, I just show the
problem to be corrected.

Best regards
Roberto