[nc-review] Can I suggest?

["YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>]

Hello Review-Committee members,

First, thank you, Roberto and Alejandro, for your responses out of
silence.

It is a good news that US's LONG holiday is getting toward its end:-)
and Theresa's positive interest in forming DNSO Review WG is
mostly welcomed.

It seems that we are going to have at least three teleconferences
due to DNSO Board election, which has been established as
our most critical mission out of other paper missions.

Therefore, I want to suggest each constituency come up with a
constituency development report to self-reflect constituency itself.

As we have seen, there have been folks out there who are skeptical
about the constituency and its representations system like Names
Council and it is right time for each constituency to look back on it.

Thanks,

YJ

> Hi!
>
> it would certainly be helpful if at least one NC member from each
> constituency could briefly tell us what discussion on the Review has
> occuerred in the constituency and to what conclusions it points; or to
> state actively that nothing of the kind has happened!
>
> Alejandro PIsanty
>
>
> .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
.
>      Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
> UNAM  -  Educacion Abierta y a Distancia
> Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico
> Tel. (+52-5) 622-8713, 622-8633 Fax 550-8405
>
> http://www.cuaed.unam.mx
> ---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, www.isocmex.org.mx, www.isoc.org
> =====>>> Participa en ICANN, www.icann.org
> ---->> Internet y Sociedad? www.istf.org
> .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
.
>
>
>
>