Re: [nc-review] REMINDER DNSO Review

["Paul M. Kane" <Paul.Kane@reacto.com>]

Roberto...

R.Gaetano@iaea.org wrote:

> Paul,
>
> Not at all.
>
> This "task force" has been constituted foreseeing a Working Group in the
> future.
> All what is needed is the NC to start the working group.
>
> As this list is almost silent since its creation, I tend to think it will
> continue to stay silent, and therefore will not allow us to make any
> progress.
>

I have certainly been working on this issue internally ..... but your point is
well made.... and I will make sure it is discussed in detail during our NC Tel
Conf on the 21st September.

We need to move this issue forward such that our recommendations are available
to the Board in advance of the LA meeting...

Thanks and hope you too have a great w/end...

Best

Paul



>
>
> Can please the NC take the decision to start a WG, as envisaged in Yokohama,
> to provide the framework in which everybody (in the Constituencies and in
> the GA) can share their opinions? We have lost enough time, methinks. More
> than two months, in fact. And I disagree on the fact of losing more time.
>
> In fact, the very fact that the NC is losing time on important issues like
> this is *in itself* the proof that some reform of the functioning of the
> DNSO is needed.
>
> Have a nice weekend.
>
> Roberto
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Paul M. Kane [mailto:Paul.Kane@reacto.com]
> > Sent: Friday, 15 September 2000 18:31
> > To: Elisabeth Porteneuve
> > Cc: council@dnso.org; nc-review@dnso.org
> > Subject: Re: [nc-review] REMINDER DNSO Review
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the reminder Elizabeth... and to Roberto for his
> > summary...it
> > helps us better understand the issues...
> >
> > As mentioned on today's telconf ... a number of us a
> > currently asking our
> > constituencies for input......
> >
> > Any review must be an inclusive process and should we ignore
> > the voice of
> > our communities (to meet a short time-line) we do so at our peril....
> >
> > It is important IMHO that we build the stability of ICANN
> > (organization and
> > process) by taking our time and making our review as thorough
> > as possible.
> >
> > May I propose we revise the time line such that we have a
> > draft ready for
> > consideration by the whole NC by the end of October, with the ratified
> > recommendations sent to the Board at least two (preferably
> > three) weeks
> > before the LA meeting. Would this be acceptable to all??
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >
> >
> > Elisabeth Porteneuve wrote:
> >
> > > Colleagues,
> > >
> > > It occured on the today NC telecon that a reminder about DNSO
> > > Review Committee could be helpful. Here is the notification
> > > from ICANN I sent to the Names Council on Aug 9th.
> > >
> > > To have a complete update on the Review Committes, the current
> > > list of participants is provided.
> > >
> > > As far as I recall, Pindar told as in Yokohama that the Committee
> > > is supposed to deliver a report for 13 October 2000.
> > > Pindar or Alejandro -- could you confirm us this timeline ?
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Elisabeth
> > >
> > >   ICANN BoD:  "Pindar Wong" <pindar@hk.super.net>
> > >   ICANN BoD:  "Alejandro Pisanty" <apisan@servidor.unam.mx>
> > >   ISPCP:      "Hirofumi Hotta" <h.hotta@hco.ntt.co.jp>
> > >   Business:   "Theresa Swinehart" <Theresa.Swinehart@wcom.com>
> > >   Registrars: "Paul Kane" <Paul.Kane@reacto.com>
> > >   ccTLD:      "Patricio Poblete" <ppoblete@nic.cl>
> > >   IPC:        "Axel Aus der Muhlen" <aaus@mpaa.org>
> > >   NCDNH:      "Youn Jung Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>
> > >   gTLD:       "Roger Cochetti" <rcochetti@netsol.com>
> > >   DNSO Sec:   "Elisabeth Porteneuve"
> > <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>
> > >   ICANN staff:"Louis Touton" <touton@icann.org>
> > >   ICANN staff:"Andrew McLaughlin" <mclaughlin@pobox.com>
> > >   GA Chair:   "Roberto Gaetano" <R.Gaetano@iaea.org>
> > >
> > > > From owner-council@dnso.org Wed Aug  9 09:12 MET 2000
> > > > Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 09:10:59 +0200 (MET DST)
> > > > From: Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>
> > > > Message-Id: <200008090710.JAA07824@balsa.cetp.ipsl.fr>
> > > > To: council@dnso.org, nc-review@dnso.org
> > > > Subject: [council] Review Committee update
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Colleagues,
> > > >
> > > > Alejandro Pisanty from the ICANN Executive Committee
> > > > (the DNSO elected ICANN Board Director in October 1999)
> > > > is joining the NC Review Committee.
> > > > His email address has been added to the nc-review@dnso.org list.
> > > >
> > > > Welcome Alejandro !
> > > >
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > > Elisabeth
> > > >
> > > > > From touton@icann.org Wed Aug  9 02:26 MET 2000
> > > > > Message-ID: <3990A6C7.B38644FD@icann.org>
> > > > > Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 17:33:11 -0700
> > > > > From: Louis Touton <touton@icann.org>
> > > > > To: Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>
> > > > > CC: Alejandro Pisanty <apisan@servidor.unam.mx>,
> > > > >         Pindar Wong <pindar@HK.Super.NET>,
> > > > >         Andrew McLaughlin <mclaughlin@pobox.com>,
> > > > >         Michael Roberts <roberts@icann.org>
> > > > > Subject: Mailing List for Review Committee
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear Elisabeth,
> > > > >
> > > > > Pindar Wong, the ICANN Executive Committee member who is acting
> > > > > as the liaison between the EC and the NC on the DNSO review
> > > > > project, will be leaving the Board on 30 September.  Alejandro
> > > > > Pisanty, also an EC member, will begin serving as
> > backup liaison,
> > > > > with the expectation that he will assume the role of
> > main liaison
> > > > > after Pindar's term is concluded.
> > > > >
> > > > > Would you be so kind as to put Alejandro on the Review Committee
> > > > > mailing list?  His address is <apisan@servidor.unam.mx>.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks, as always, for your help.
> > > > >
> > > > > Louis
> > > > >
> > > >
> >