[nc-review] Re: [council] Minutes from 19 October NC teleconference

["YJ Park" <yjpark@myepark.com>]

> Thank you very much for your comments.
> However I think that Secretariat should not include them in MINUTES,
> because they are post-minutes COMMENTS to the teleconference, which you
> could not attend (therefore apology -- added).

Thank you, Elisabeth.

> Actually I am glad to see your comment on the Whois group, I do believe
> that a whois issue (data protection issue) is a  very important one,
> and would like to know more on the Whois group composition as well as
> get written documents on its work, even if it is about very
> technical matters.

Yes. Hope we can hear from the whois committee soon
and have a formal committee formation process in order to
reflect all these concerns expressed here and there.

Regards,
YJ

> Best,
> Elisabeth
> --
>
> YJP wrote:
> |
> | There are several inquiries regarding Oct teleconference where
> | I could not attend due to my long flight.
> |
> | Request to Elisabeth,
> | Can you please add my post-comments to the minutes with apology
> | regarding 2nd, Whois committee and 3rd, the resolution circulation?
> |
> | 1st, Review Committee Status Report
> | -------------------------------------------------------------
> | Louis Touton noted that Theresa Swinehart was scheduled
> | to report to the ICANN Board the day after the NC meeting
> | -------------------------------------------------------------
> | [snip]
> |
> | Can we have further update regarding this from Theresa?
> | Thanks in advance, Theresa.
> |
> | 2nd, Whois Committee
> | ----------------------------------------------------------------
> | Whois committee is to develop some ideas and pass them to the
> | NC or to the ICANN staff, depending on whether the ideas involved
> | new policy or implementation of existing policy.
> |
> | The group includes registrar/registry and intellectual property
interests.
> | To the extent that the report raises issues for decision that involve
> | new policy rather than implementation of existing policy...
> | ----------------------------------------------------------------
> |
> | I have some concerns regarding this committee.
> |
> | Due to lack of time during the MdR NC meeting, this has not been
> | discussed enough and no interim report has been presented, either.
> | Therefore, it would be appreciated to have such a report asap,
> | if it's available.
> |
> | My first concern,
> | Appreciating staff-driven Whois committee's works so far,
> | every implementation issue is very likely to be asociated with
> | policy issues and that's why it should be open as much as possible.
> |
> | My second concern,
> | I think it's time to open this committee to all the constituencies.
> | Even though most topics are limited to registrar/registry and
> | intellectual property interests, the decisions on either implementation
> | or policy are supposed to have serious impacts to the users, too.
> |
> | That's why DNSO included these groups from the beginning.
> |
> | 3rd, The resolution circulation
> | --------------------------------------------------------------------
> | Louis Touton commented that resolutions made could be forwarded
> | to the NC and could then be presented at the Public Forum.
> | --------------------------------------------------------------------
> |
> | It would be great to notify each constituency that this procedure is
> | already set up in the NC. Since there have been some confusions
> | whether this is possible or not from time to time.
> |
> | YJ
> |
> | > The minutes from 19 October NC teleconference, drafted by Rebecca
> | > Nessen, verified over Thanksgiving week-end by Louis Touton,
> | > and re-read this sunny Paris Sunday by myself are in:
> | >     http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20001019.NCtelecon-minutes.html
> | >
> | > I do hope you will be happy with it, if no addition/comment before
> | > next Friday, 1 December, I will distribute to all DNSO lists.
> | >
> | > Please note the next two NC teleconferences will be held on:
> | >        Tuesday 19 December 2000 and Wednesday 24 January 2001
> | > it is time to submit agenda suggestions to the Intake Committee.
> | >
> | > Kind regards,
> | > Elisabeth
> | >
> |
> |
>