RE: [nc-review] Resending per MdR discussion, FW: [council] NC Review 2.0 Circulation for Comment.

[R.Gaetano@iaea.org]

Peter,
> 
> Roberto, where you say "(plus the additional recent one that
> WG-D has not come to a real procedure to start WGs, and so we 
> can't start")
> 
> If you were referring to my comment about WG-D, I was saying that to
> reinforce our need to to start this (list for) WG-F 
> immediately, not to
> delay it.
> 

I believe you.
I confess I did not see your comment, I just referred to the (currently
1-before-the-last) archived NC mail
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc04/msg00535.html from Caroline,
dated 2000-11-30, that includes the following paragraph:

	With respect to YJ's WGF, has WGD ever completed a report outlining 
	the process for the formation and functioning of working groups.  
	While I agree that the working groups in the past have had little 
	formal process, I do not think that is a reason to blindly forge 
	ahead. I would hope that like the formation of the Intake Committee,
a 
	proposal for WG formation and functions could be hammered out rather

	quickly.  

Regards
Roberto