RE: [nc-review] Final report Review - reply please by 4 November

[tony.ar.holmes@bt.com]

I agree
Tony
> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Philip Sheppard [SMTP:philip.sheppard@aim.be]
> Sent:	Friday, November 02, 2001 10:56 AM
> To:	nc-review
> Subject:	[nc-review] Final report Review - reply please by 4 November
> Importance:	High
> 
> Review task force members
> In accord with our agreed timetable, the public comment period on the
> interim report closed October 28 and the comments list is now closed. I
> have now reviewed comments received both on the NC list and the special
> comments list. There were few.  One comment sent by Joop Teernstra chose
> to answer the test criteria proposed for new constituencies - thus
> validating the worth of these criteria.
>  
> I propose therefore that we convert our interim report directly into our
> final report (with one small addition) and submit it to the Names Council.
> The addition is under the item Consensus. There was a misunderstanding in
> some quarters that we were recommending the NC would do less outreach and
> consensus building. This is not the case and I propose the addition of the
> phrase:
> "This does not remove from the NC the obligation to discuss issues and
> outreach to stakeholders via mechanisms such as task forces, working
> groups and constituency liaison."
> 
> Please confirm your support latest 4 November for adopting the interim as
> our final report with this one addition. A copy of the proposed final
> report is attached.
> 
> Philip Chair TF Review
>  << File: Final report review task force.doc >>