ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-transfer]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[nc-transfer] Action requested on Vany's proposal


Ross,

I am looking to ensure that registrants are included in this process and have 
already specified a framework by which we can undertake a consultation in an 
orderly manner -- the framework is the Open Working Group which would allow 
for full registrant representation and which accords with the Rules of 
Procedures for the NC.  

That the Chair of this group is aware of these procedures and definitions and 
has made absolutely no effort to properly provide for registrant 
participation, even though VeriSign put this issue on the table by noting 
that our three-legged stool (registries/registrars/registrants) is missing 
its third leg is indicative of the fact that this Chair, for her own reasons, 
will not act in a neutral capacity.  

I am sorry to hear that you consider the fight for the representational 
rights of registrants to be a distraction.  Those of us in the GA do not.  

Further, let me suggest that if you intend put to our interim chair a formal 
objection to the consideration of a motion designed to bring registrant 
representatives into this group that you martial your arguments as to why 
registrant representation and participation should be denied.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>