[nc-transfer] Action requested on Vany's proposal

[DannyYounger@cs.com]

Ross,

Just how do you intend to document the extent of agreement and disagreement 
among registrants, an impacted group, if the registrant community is not 
represented in this Task Force?  If the goal of this TF is to arrive at a 
consensus policy, such documentation is mandatory.   Vany's proposal 
recognizes the fact that At-Large directors are commonly regarded as 
representatives of the broader community.  This Task Force has the right to 
add members to its roster.  The UDRP Task Force is full of members that are 
neither members of the NC or GA.  We are asking the Chair to do the right 
thing and seat representatives of the registrant community on this Task Force 
which is a matter within our rights to request and is certainly allowable 
under NC procedures.  Why do you have a problem with that?