<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[nc-transfer] [fwd] Re: [ga] deletion policy - what should it look like? (from: k@widgital.com)
While this one was not mentioned in the conference calls, a
requirement for such an acknowledgement, coupled with an appropriate
deadline, would of course be another approach to handling
inadvertent deletions. It's somewhat similar to Elisabeth's
suggestion.
--
Thomas Roessler http://log.does-not-exist.org/
----- Forwarded message from Kristy McKee <k@widgital.com> -----
From: k@widgital.com (Kristy McKee)
To: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
Cc: ga@dnso.org
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 13:12:46 -0500
Subject: Re: [ga] deletion policy - what should it look like?
>- Delete between M and N days after date of expiry. (N - M = 7)
Thomas, the above in conjunction with an ACK from the TC or AC that the
deletion is indeed intentional.
:)
~k
----- End forwarded message -----
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|