ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-transfer]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[nc-transfer] RE: Proposal to Proceed


I've read Grant Forsyth's document and it basically captures most of what
I had intended to summarize. I greatly appreciate it when TF members do this
kind of very useful drafting.  Ross also volunteered to do some more drafting on
the transfer work area, and I wanted to say thanks for that, as well.

So, on deletions/WLS, and working from Grant's document, I plan to post something later tonight
or tomorrow to the TR-TF.... comment needed, and welcomed.

This is intended for all members of the TF-- please post any comments based on the 
present work effort which you haven't posted so far, both on AA and on deletes/WLS.

We have submissions from BC, IPC, and GA... as well as Registrars... and several
individual submissions following our outreach calls, including Elisabeth posting as 
an individual. [thanks, Elisabeth].    Let me know if your constituency submitted 
something and I failed to note it here... ...

And, if you've posted in the long ago past with input, or edits, it would be 
very helpful if you invested the time of looking at your constituency's input 
and noting how and what their views are
in terms of the present work efforts that are published.  

Of course, in the TF, you are representing constituencies/GA, not individual companies...We all 
understand and expect that "vetting" will be work in progress and that 
you will need to respond in this particular round of comments and input,
based on your best information from your constituency/GA. 

If there is a need for an individual company to post purely for factual input, 
such as Verisign Registry, Christine, please have Chuck Gomes do that and 
That way we can ensure that you can continue to wear the hat of representing
the constituency's larger viewpoint, along with Sloan.  

I am making an exception for VS Registry due to the fact that 
we are considering VS WLS as part of the deletions discussion and there may be 
points of fact which VS Registry wishes to clarify.  

Thanks, Grant, for undertaking the drafting. Much appreciated. 
And Ross, for your offer of help on the work on AA/EA.  Marilyn
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 12:08 PM
To: grant.forsyth@clear.co.nz
Cc: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA; nc-transfer@dnso.org
Subject: Proposal to Proceed


Grant,

I wanted to pass on for inclusion in the formal record that, after further
consideration, your proposal to proceed concerning the WLS and deletes makes
eminent sense and has my support.

My apologies for dragging the call into that rat hole, but having joined a
few minutes late, I didn't have the benefit of fully understanding the
nuances of the background discussion that led to your comments. I might even
go as far as noting that we likely have consensus on this issue within the
TF and should be able to proceed as you described without further delay.

Thanks again,

-rwr



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>