ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-transfer]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [nc-transfer] WLS proposal


Marilyn, I am one of the NCC reps on the TF.  Are you asking if my proposal 
has the endorsement of the NCC?   Jamie


Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
> Jamie, thanks for your posting. On behalf of the Non commercial constituency, do you also have comments on the WLS?   
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Love [mailto:james.love@cptech.org]
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 3:22 PM
> To: Transfer TF (E-mail)
> Cc: NCDNHC-discuss list
> Subject: [nc-transfer] WLS proposal
> 
> 
> As one of the members of the Transfers TK from the NCC, this is my proposed 
> solution to the problem of expired domains.
> 
> Rather than allocate these domains on a first come first serve basis, which 
>   creates a lot of problems in terms of how people get first in line, and 
> which also  presents problems for people that did not intend to let a domain 
> lapse, I propose the following proceedure.
> 
> 1.  Whenever a domain expires, and after whatever grace period is 
> appropriate, it be placed upon a list of expired domains, maintained joinly 
> by the registrars who want to participate, with equal access to the list.
> 
> 2.  Over a period of 30 days, any person who wants to register the expired 
> domain can express an interest.
> 
> 3.  During the 30 day period, the original domain owner can reactivate the 
> domain.
> 
> 4.  If the original domain owner has not reactivated the domain during the 
> 30 day period, the domain is assigned by lottery to one of the parties 
> seeking the domain.
> 
> Jamie
> 
> 
> ------
> James Love, Consumer Project on Technology
> http://www.cptech.org, mailto:love@cptech.org
> voice: 1.202.387.8030; mobile 1.202.361.3040
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



-- 
------
James Love, Consumer Project on Technology
http://www.cptech.org, mailto:love@cptech.org
voice: 1.202.387.8030; mobile 1.202.361.3040




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>