ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-transfer]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[nc-transfer] Re: [ncdnhc-discuss] WLS proposal


Jamie,
What do you mean by "accurate" whois data?  Does this mean that you support
HR 4640, which would make it a felony to provide inaccurate information,
even including address info of the domain name holder?  I'm sure you
appreciate the privacy implications of requiring domain name owners, eg
parents who have purchased domain names for their kids, to provide their
physical addresses.
Barbara
P.S.  While it's important that accurate whois information be provided for
the technical contact, I see no compelling reason for providing accurate
address information about the owner of the domain name.

On 6/17/02 12:35 PM, "James Love" <james.love@cptech.org> wrote:

> Marc Schneiders wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> How do you make sure that I do not try to be 1000 persons, so enhancing my
>> chance at getting a domain in the lottery?
> 
>   Well, I would require that you provide accurate whois data in order to
> bid, and if you committed fraud, I would bar you from future participation.
>   You could also rely upon a financial transaction to confirm a real
> billing address.
> 
> Jamie
> 
> 
> ------
> James Love, Consumer Project on Technology
> http://www.cptech.org, mailto:love@cptech.org
> voice: 1.202.387.8030; mobile 1.202.361.3040
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss@icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>