Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [ga] Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [nc-transfer] Re: [ncdnhc-discuss] WLS proposal

[eric@hi-tek.com]

WXW,

You propose deceit and so why have a whois?
Has someone self proclaimed that domains are property - Hooray for them, we have
no more WLS problem as they will have to go to court to expire a property interest
with due process.

WXW you are a great man to have decided these issues in this way and all
dotcommoners are beholding to you.

Eric


William X Walsh wrote:

> The use a PO Box or private mail box facility, or one of the new
> breed of "domain agencies" who let you substitute their information
> for your own, acting as your substitute point of contact.
>
> How you protect your privacy is up to you, you decide what level of
> protection you want, and you do it yourself.
>
> Why should anyone mandate whois be private, when property ownership
> isn't, anywhere in the United States.   And like whois, they are
> required by statute to make the information available in bulk format
> to companies who aggregate this information, and then turn around and
> provide public access to the aggregate database for searching.
>
> Using one of these databases, I can get a list of real property owned
> by you, Barbara, anywhere in the United States, and all the associated
> addresses, including any outstanding mortgages or liens.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
> --
> Save Internet Radio!
> CARP will kill Webcasting!
> http://www.saveinternetradio.org/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de