Re: [nc-transfer] Registry & Registrar Enforcement Models

[Dan <synthesis@videotron.ca>]

Ross, do you think you do a quick-and-dirty workup of what you think are
the differences between the two models? If Jeff agrees that the workup
is a good model of the differences then....we have the right starting
point.  I think in the past we have gotten into a subject only realize
after much work that we didnt agree on the basics.

The workup would certainly help me get a handle on the issue(s) and
hopefully we as a task force can learn from our previous mistakes.

"Ross Wm. Rader" wrote:
> 
> I just wanted to note for the record that there are striking
> similarities between the enforcement and resolution model that Jeff
> Neuman has proposed and the alternate proposal that I put forward
> yesterday.
> 
> My preference would be to work within the TF to come up with a unified
> model that everyone can agree to. I'm happy to work with Jeff on this
> directly but first want to make sure that the TF views are also at the
> table. We should hear some further discussion and perhaps take this up
> during a call before we unilaterally move forward (and I'm sure our
> chair would appreciate having some say in our work as well ;)
> 
> Resolving this issue strikes me as being one of the last few "gnarly"
> items that we have to deal with (in addition to where the policy might
> live contractually).
> 
> Comments welcomed.
> 
>                        -rwr
> 
> "There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
> idiot."
> - Steven Wright
> 
> Got Blog? http://www.byte.org/blog
> 
> Please review our ICANN Reform Proposal:
> http://www.byte.org/heathrow
> 
>