RE: [nc-transfer] Bee in the bonnet...

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us>]

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:18 AM
To: Neuman, Jeff; 'Cade,Marilyn S - LGA'; nc-transfer@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [nc-transfer] Bee in the bonnet...


Fair enough - that's enough of a statement for me to drop the request. I
misunderstood the importance of the issue for the competitive registries and
was more concerned with ensuring that the TF didn't craft recommendations
that stepped on your toes ;)

I withdraw the request.

(Was that explicit enough ;)

Thanks,


                     -rwr




Got Blog? http://www.byte.org/blog

"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of
thought which they seldom use."
 - Soren Kierkegaard



----- Original Message -----
From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@neustar.us>
To: "'Cade,Marilyn S - LGA'" <mcade@att.com>; "Ross Wm. Rader"
<ross@tucows.com>; <nc-transfer@dnso.org>
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:08 AM
Subject: RE: [nc-transfer] Bee in the bonnet...


> I would be completely against this proposal.  The EPP Registries are
having
> a lot of difficulties with the Registrars at this point in time with the
> handing out of Auth-codes and to not address the problems that we are able
> to address would be shirking our responsibilities.
>
> I hope that was strong enough for you :)
>
> Seriously, it is imperative to solve these issues.  Without addressing
what
> we can, the Task Force report will not have the support from NeuLevel,
> Afilias, GNR, etc.
>
> Thank you.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA [mailto:mcade@att.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 8:09 AM
> To: Ross Wm. Rader; nc-transfer@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [nc-transfer] Bee in the bonnet...
>
>
> I think this is reasonable. more than "wait and see", though, probably
more
> likely  we need feedback in some usable form from the existing users of
EPP
> which can be inluded as an insert, and then some assessment about time
frame
>
> which it has been used; feedback from staff and
community/users/registries.
>
> Marilyn
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 1:18 AM
> To: nc-transfer@dnso.org
> Subject: [nc-transfer] Bee in the bonnet...
>
>
> ..something that I'd like to discuss during the next appropriate call.
>
> Given that it is likely that the final report will have built-in review
> process, we might want to punt on making EPP specific recommendations at
> this juncture given that the standard has yet to be ratified and that
> Verisign has not yet adopted it. This is a poli-co-speak way of stating
that
> it might be possible that the community does not have enough experience
with
> EPP at this juncture to make specific recommendations regarding policy
> specifics (other than the obvious, "maybe we should wait and see what pops
> up" type of recommendations)...
>
> Thoughts? Comments? Defer until the call?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>                      -rwr
>
>
>
>
> Got Blog? http://www.byte.org/blog
>
> "People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of
> thought which they seldom use."
>  - Soren Kierkegaard
>
>