RE: [nc-udrp] question

["Chicoine, Caroline G." <CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com>]

I would prefer to leave it as is, since in the earlier sections we were
talking specifically about UDRP and thus want to track its language, but in
question 54, we are dealing generally with cybersquatting which could
conceivably cover more than simply "abusive domain name registrations"

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Steinberg [mailto:synthesis@videotron.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 10:06 PM
To: 'nc-udrp@dnso.org'
Subject: [nc-udrp] question


As I was translating the questionnaire, I came upon the word
"cybesquatting" in question 54. Its use was eliminated elsewhere in the
questionnaire in favor of  the UDRP term. How should I handle this
apparent inconsistency in the translation of question 54 (and no it does
not mean that I am almost finished....)

--
Dan Steinberg

SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin  phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec  fax:   (819) 827-4398
J9B 1N1                 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca