Re: [nc-udrp] Re: UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC

[Dan Steinberg <synthesis@videotron.ca>]

From experience, I suggest we wait a bit to see what kind of responses we get
initially.  We may better be able to suggest a strategy at that time.  Also, I
expect (without proof) that there will be a steady flow of responses initially
and a flurry as we approach the filing deadline.  So perhaps the optimal work
arrangement might change at that time as well.



"J.Scott Evans" wrote:

> I like Katrina's suggestion.
>
> J. Scott
>
> Katrina Burchell writes:
>
> >
> > We could also split up the questions between us and look at a selection
> > together providing a summary for other members of the Task Force
> >
> > Katrina
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chicoine, Caroline G. [SMTP:CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2001 12:12 AM
> > To:   'Dan Steinberg'; Oscar A. Robles-Garay
> > Cc:   DNSO Secretariat; Chicoine, Caroline G.; council@dnso.org;
> > nc-udrp@dnso.org
> > Subject:      RE: [nc-udrp] Re: [council] Re: UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC
> >
> > I agree with you Dan.  If we get so many responses that the Task Force
> > believes it needs more time to review, we can jump that hurdle when we get
> > there.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dan Steinberg [mailto:synthesis@videotron.ca]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 6:09 PM
> > To: Oscar A. Robles-Garay
> > Cc: DNSO Secretariat; Chicoine, Caroline G.; council@dnso.org;
> > nc-udrp@dnso.org
> > Subject: Re: [nc-udrp] Re: [council] Re: UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC
> >
> >
> > I think it's safe to assume more than 'tens'. Hundreds are a safer bet.
> > But I expect it's a bit late to change the process now that the
> > questionnaire has been issued. However I don't expect this to be a
> > problem since our aim was to find ideas not count 'votes'.  Besdes, no
> > matter how we phrase the questions, the order of magnitude for the
> > problem is the same, since we have to have some place on each
> > questionnaire for readers to give us their ideas free form. That is to
> > say where the answer is
> > 'other_____  If so please explain___________________'
> >
> > "Oscar A. Robles-Garay" wrote:
> >
> >> How many responses are you expecting to have with this questionnaire ?
> >>
> >> tens? hundreds? thousands?
> >>
> >> In case you are expecting something bigger than "tens" I would say to
> >> think in the review process and change the initial format for specific
> >> questions/answers, it is not easy to read thousands of pages of
> >> comments.
> >>
> >> Oscar
> >>
> >>
> >> At 05:34 AM 11/6/2001, DNSO Secretariat wrote:
> >>
> >>> Secretariat proposal :
> >>>
> >>> May be the best thing to do is not to put anything on the Website,
> >>> but to post the Questionnaire in a txt format to ga@dnso.org and to
> >>> nc-udrp@dnso.org, with an automatic reply to nc-udrp@dnso.org so
> >>> that people from the Task force can review the results.
> >>> Then the only thing people will have to do is to reply to the mail
> >>> and to fill in the blanks.
> >>> Any comments ?
> >>>
> >>> dnso.org webmaster.
> >>>
> >>> On 05 Nov, Chicoine, Caroline G. wrote :
> >>> > Please find below the UDRP Review Questionnaire for posting on the
> >>> ICANN and
> >>> > DNSO's websites.  Once it has been posted by the Secretariat, I
> >>> ask that
> >>> > each Council member provide your Constituency with the link, and
> >>> that Danny
> >>> > provide the GA with a link (I do not have Danny's email handy and
> >>> I cannot
> >>> > get out of this email to access it so I will resend with a copy to
> >>> him).
> >>> >
> >>> > As you will note, there are several "Other" areas and areas in
> >>> which we are
> >>> > requesting comments (rather than a "yes" or "no") and so I was
> >>> unsure as to
> >>> > whether I needed to actually leave blanks or not.  Let me know if
> >>> any format
> >>> > changes are required.  Also, how should the Task Force review the
> >>> repsonse.
> >>> > Will they be posted to nc-udrp@dnso.org or will we need to monitor
> >>> a certain
> >>> > list?  Please advise.
> >>> >
> >>> > Please email the list when it is posted so that are translators
> >>> can then
> >>> > translate it into French and Spanish.  Once translated, could our
> >>> > translators please send the translated version to the Secretariat,
> >>> for
> >>> > posting, and again I ask that once posted the Council members
> >>> advise their
> >>> > Constituencies and Danny the GA.
> >>> >
> >>> > Finally, upon a review of the current draft of the Terms of
> >>> Reference, I
> >>> > noticed that it needs to be updated.  Specifically, the "November
> >>> 2-December
> >>> > 15" deadline for submitting questionnaire to public should be
> >>> changed to
> >>> > "November 2-December 17"  given I am two days late in getting it
> >>> posted.
> >>> > Likewise, please change the "November 1-January 15" deadline to
> >>> November
> >>> > 1-January 17", and the January 16-February 1" deadline to January
> >>> > 17-February 13".  The February 14 deadline stays the same, but the
> >>> entry
> >>> > should read "Names Council votes on Report at its February 14th
> >>> > teleconference"
> >>> >
> >>> > If you have any questions, please let me know.
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks to all of those who participated in developing the
> >>> questionnaire.
> >>> > Please remember that our work has only just begun.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >  <<UDRP Review Questionnaire.DOC>>
> >>
> >> Top Level Domain .MX
> >> Tel +52 (8)3875346
> >> http://www.nic.mx
> >>
> >> El contenido del presente mensaje de datos es confidencial. El Emisor
> >> no es apoderado de NIC-Mexico ni tiene facultad alguna para obligar a
> >> NIC-Mexico con la transmision y contenido del presente mensaje de
> >> datos, incluyendo el (los) archivo(s) anexo(s).
> >
> > --
> > Dan Steinberg
> >
> > SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
> > 35, du Ravin  phone: (613) 794-5356
> > Chelsea, Quebec  fax:   (819) 827-4398
> > J9B 1N1                 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca
> >
>

--
Dan Steinberg

SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin  phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec  fax:   (819) 827-4398
J9B 1N1                 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca