Re: [nc-udrp] UDRP Questionnaire

[Dan Steinberg <synthesis@videotron.ca>]

Actually I think we discussed this at the beginning, and since someone (Milton
perhaps) suggested that we werent 'counting votes'...but looking for ideas, we
really didn't care if someone stuffed the ballots.  After all, even with e-mail
validation nothing is stopping that process. We did ask for one comment per
person, so theoretically if someone posts twice and has different ideas we like
in each we could chose to ignore the later one.  But I suspect we wouldn't.

One could get a few dozen e-mail addresses put together in way less time than it
would take to craft actual responses, so really the e-mail verification is just a
formality, like the product code on the CD case for software.

"Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" wrote:

> Isn't the identity important?
> What stops people stuffing the box otherwise?
>
> (If the answer is no, I want the same logic applied to the whois,
> please... :>)
>
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2001, Chicoine, Caroline G. wrote:
>
> > I have received several inquiries asking me to confirm that this process
> > will be confidential (ie there will be no public record of the specifics of
> > who completed questionnaires).  Can you confirm that this is the case.  In
> > other words, if I email my response, will there be a trace of my email
> > address with the response?
> >
>
> --
>                 Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
> A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin@law.tm
> U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
> +1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
>                         -->It's warm here.<--

--
Dan Steinberg

SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin  phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec  fax:   (819) 827-4398
J9B 1N1                 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca