ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-udrp]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [nc-udrp] UDRP Questionnaire


I agree. Privacy is unnecessary and undesirable.
This is public comment on a public regulatory
issue. 
--MM

>>> Dan Steinberg <synthesis@videotron.ca> 11/21/01 19:21 PM >>>
ummmmmm I am wondering if this is appropriate.
We are a public task force seeking public comment. Is it really appropriate to
be wondering about privacy here?
Every other model I have seen, without explicitly stating so, seems to work on
the assumption that comments are for public view.
I know the NOI and RFC processes in various governments I have worked with all
post everyone's comments as web pages.  That DOC process is one I remember
recommending when we first published the questionnaire.

In any event, I feel if someone is really concerned about anonymity, they can
always use a mail service like hotmail or yahoo, completely un-traceable.

Or is there something I am missing here?

"Chicoine, Caroline G." wrote:

> I have received several inquiries asking me to confirm that this process
> will be confidential (ie there will be no public record of the specifics of
> who completed questionnaires).  Can you confirm that this is the case.  In
> other words, if I email my response, will there be a trace of my email
> address with the response?

--
Dan Steinberg

SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin  phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec  fax:   (819) 827-4398
J9B 1N1                 e-mail:synthesis@videotron.ca





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>