<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [nc-udrp] UDRP Review Questionnaire
Caroline,
Good idea, thats the way the WHOIS TF is working on the
responses to the WHOIS questionnaire. We will
have to agree on a framework which reflects
uniformity in the summary of responses.
Tony Harris
----- Mensaje original -----
De: "Chicoine, Caroline G." <CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com>
Para: "'Maxim Waldbaum'" <mwaldbaum@salans.com>; "Chicoine, Caroline G."
<CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com>
CC: <nc-udrp@dnso.org>
Enviado: Lunes 7 de Enero de 2002 12:20
Asunto: RE: [nc-udrp] UDRP Review Questionnaire
> I was not aware of the email from the Secretariat below. I am also not
> aware that there is a problem with reviewing the answers since the number
of
> questions stayed the same and I believe only the format of question 13 was
> changed. We should be able to handle. ICANN finally posted the
> Questionnaire on its website and we have extended the period offor
> responding for one month (Feb 6th). I will be starting to send out some
of
> the response we have received shortly. While everyone will have access to
> each response, I propose assigning a set number of responses to Task Force
> members to help delegate the work and get our job done in a reasonable
> period of time.
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|