RE: [nc-udrp] RE: Summary of Responses 82-89

["Chicoine, Caroline G." <CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com>]

While part of our job is to compile the information, we are not going to
generate statistics as I believe this is meaningless for the reasons that I
stated at the beginning of the formation of this group.  Also, I intend to
use all of your expertise in helping to interpret the responses and develop
suggestions for where do we go from here.  For example, if people said they
wanted better decisions but did not point to what was wrong with existing
decisions, such a response does not tell us much and will most likely not be
given much weight.  Likewise, if we get some support for an appeal process
but no recommendations as to what it would look like or how it would be paid
for, than that will be an exercise for us to look into and perhaps make
suggestions.  Why doesn't everyone sit back and let's see the initial
results of the DNSO responses before getting too upset about this.  As you
all know, ICANN is a learning experience, and we all had input (or at least
the opportunity to input) as to how this UDRP Review process was going to
work and while we may look back and say, if I had it to do over again, I
would have done it this way, let's try to make this work.




-----Original Message-----
From: James Carmody [mailto:carmodyjim@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 1:10 PM
To: MSD@tzmm.com; CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com; carmody@lawyer.com;
nc-udrp@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [nc-udrp] RE: Summary of Responses 82-89


You are correct, Scott.  It took me about 3.5 hours to
go over that stuff. A lot of the verbal material was
lost because there was not enough space provided.  I
guess I could sum it all up by saying that my survey
people wanted "better decisions" (more in favor of
Respondents) rendered by 3 member panels paid little
or nothing with a robust opportunity to appeal.  We
did not ask a question about paying for this and I
received no suggestions.

Regards,
Jim
--- MSD@tzmm.com wrote:
> It seems a terrible waste of resources to have the
> designated
> representatives, who were chosen for their
> experience, to be reduced to the
> role of mere clerks in compiling statistics.  It
> also would be a terrible
> mistake to base changes in policy on a numerical
> count of responses.  It
> seems to me that the representatives, after
> reviewing all of the responses
> to make specific recommendations for changes. 
> Perhaps the representatives
> could be broken down into subcommittees to discuss
> and recommend on certain
> issues.  Otherwise, my secretary could just as
> easily performed my function.
> 
> Best regards.
> 
> M. Scott Donahey
> Tomlinson Zisko Morosoli & Maser LLP
> 200 Page Mill Rd.
> Palo Alto, CA  94306
> Phone:  (650) 325-8666
> Fax:      (650) 324-1808
> msd@tzmm.com
> www.tzmm.com
> 
> 		"This email message is for the sole use of the
> intended
> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
> privileged information.  Any
> unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
> is prohibited.  If you
> are not the intended recipient, please contact the
> sender by reply email and
> destroy all copies of the original message."
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com
> [mailto:CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 9:56 AM
> To: carmody@lawyer.com;
> CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com; nc-udrp@dnso.org
> Subject: [nc-udrp] RE: Summary of Responses 82-89
> 
> 
> Oh, Jim you are not off the hook yet!!!!!  We still
> have to review the
> responses received from the ICANN website (which I
> have not yet received
> from ICANN) and then the Chairs will try to
> accumulate everyone's summaries
> and prepare a draft report, but we will want
> everyone's input on the draft
> before we final it and send it to NC.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Carmody [mailto:carmodyjim@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 5:13 PM
> To: cchicoine@thompsoncoburn.com; nc-udrp@dnso.org
> Subject: Summary of Responses 82-89
> 
> 
> Attached.  I have really enjoyed working with all of
> you and will enjoy reading the final report.
> 
> Best wishes from Houston,
> Jim Carmody
> 
> =====
> James A. Carmody, nn5o, carmody@lawyer.com
> Voice Mail: 713 446 4234; eFax: 815 461 5321
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Sports - sign up for Fantasy Baseball
> http://sports.yahoo.com
> 


=====
James A. Carmody, nn5o, carmody@lawyer.com
Voice Mail: 713 446 4234; eFax: 815 461 5321

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
http://mail.yahoo.com/