<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [nc-udrp] Another Amusing Pathological UDRP Case
Maybe we need a one-bite rule?
On Fri, 10 May 2002, John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D. wrote:
>
> On the pending list is NAF 113258 <hongdou.com>.
>
> Interestingly, hongdou.com was the subject of
> http://www.disputes.org/eresolution/decisions/0300.htm
> which decision issued back in September 2000.
>
> Hmmm.... but whois shows hongdou.com as having been registered in March 2002.
>
> Yes, you guessed correctly. The Hongdou folks have figured out how to file
> UDRP cases, but they have not yet figured out how to pay renewal fees for
> their domain name.
>
> While there are in fact quite a few UDRP-transferred names which have expired
> for non-payment of renewal fees, this is the first one to go back to the
> UDRP. That's got to be an expensive way to maintain a domain name.
>
>
--
Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
A. Michael Froomkin | Professor of Law | froomkin@law.tm
U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
+1 (305) 284-4285 | +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax) | http://www.law.tm
-->It's hot here.<--
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|