<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[nc-udrp] E mail disipline
- To: "UDRP Task Force" <nc-udrp@dnso.org>
- Subject: [nc-udrp] E mail disipline
- From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 09:56:14 +0100
- Cc: <carmody@lawyer.com>, "Chicoine, Caroline G." <CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com>, "DNSO SECRETARIAT" <DNSO.SECRETARIAT@dnso.org>, <erik.wilbers@wipo.int>, <faia@amauta.rep.net.pe>, <froomkin@law.miami.edu>, <gdinwood@kentlaw.edu>, <harris@cabase.org.ar>, <jberryhill@ddhs.com>, <joonh@chollian.net>, "'J. Scott Evans'" <jse@adamspat.com>, <katsh@legal.umass.edu>, "Michael Palage" <michael@palage.com>, <msd@tzmm.com>, "Mac Waldbaum" <mwaldbaum@salans.com>, <ndundas@africaip.com>, <ramesh@mimos.my>, <sythesis@videotron.ca>, <tcole@arb-forum.com>, <sarah.b.deutsch@verizon.com>
- Organization: AIM
- References: <OF8A2BB5E6.DC8CB635-ON85256C86.00172015@verizon.com>
- Sender: owner-nc-udrp@dnso.org
UDRP TF colleagues,
Its not that I don't enjoy my 300 e-mails per
day.
Its not that I did not enjoy reading about the contributions
you will be making to the UDRP work.
But did I need to read it twice?.
Could we be a little lighter on the "reply to all button" and
recognise that in the address list, the UDRP TF list was one address. J Scott
used individual addresses ONLY because the size of the attachments had caused a
problem. Future replies to nc-udrp@dnso.org will
suffice.
You will note that for emphasis you have all got this message
twice : ) Forgive me if I am getting irascible in my old
age.
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|