RE: [nc-whois] Next steps.....

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

Thanks, Tony.   I'd be honored to pick up from Paul, but we have to keep him
around as long as we can as a resource.

MC

-----Original Message-----
From: Antonio Harris [mailto:harris@cabase.org.ar]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 5:28 PM
To: Paul M. Kane; WHOIS Committee - DNSO
Subject: RE: [nc-whois] Next steps.....


Paul,

Thanks for all your good work.

I would like to propose Marylin Cade as chair to
replace Paul when he has to leave.

Regards

Tony Harris

----- Mensaje original ----- 
De: "Paul M. Kane" <Paul.Kane@reacto.com>
Para: "WHOIS Committee - DNSO" <nc-whois@dnso.org>
Enviado: Domingo 21 de Octubre de 2001 15:18
Asunto: [nc-whois] Next steps.....


> Hello all
> 
> I am delighted we now have the raw data so we can start the review work.
> I have taken a brief look and the format of the data will help us
> considerably in the evaluation, and I see that ICANN has not "cleaned"
> the data as there are three repetitive entries implying the sender had
> some transit problems in sending in the data to the survey server.
> 
> Appreciating the desire to work in teams of two, a number of you have
> asked that I select the teams at random ... so here goes....
> 
> Miriam    Danny
> YJ           Marilyn
> Oscar      Tony
> Axel         Registrar's rep (TBA)
> 
> Next we need to determine the structure of the review.
> 
> May I ask each of you to review at least 100 responses (I would suggest
> 25/30 from each category batch) in advance of your meeting in LA so you
> can (come prepared to) discuss the structure and framework of the
> evaluation.
> I would suggest a question by question assessment... remember our task
> is to establish if there was consensus amongst the respondents on a
> specific issue and/or where additional work should be undertaken, and
> the form of that additional work item. Remember the raw data needs to be
> divided amongst the group.
> 
> Due to contractual obligations I will be unable to attend LA, and I hope
> the Registrar's Constituency will be able to appoint a representative to
> the Committee so you can meet face to face in LA. Once the Registrar
> elections are held I will be leaving the Committee so you also need to
> think about the next Chair of the Committee.
> 
> As for the day of the meeting.  I have been asked to comment.... but as
> I am not attending, I have no strong views. Sunday afternoon seems the
> easiest to accommodate from a timetable perspective... as ICANN hasn't
> started and most of  you will be in LA on Sun eve, but it could be that
> (like MV) two meetings one at the start and one at the end of the ICANN
> event may be beneficial ......
> If a meeting were to be held on Sunday, what time would folks prefer,
> how about .....
> 
> Sunday 6-00pm until 8-00pm (thereby leaving time for dinner meetings
> etc...) - meet at the reception of the Marina Beach Marriott for the
> details of the specific meeting room.
> 
> As mentioned I will not be there, so it is up to you all.... just that I
> was asked to put a proposal on the table!
> 
> Best
> 
> Paul
> 
>