<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [nc-whois] drafting of the interim report... D. TBD
All on the call now - I realize that the excerpt I just sent you may not
make much sense out of context, so FYI below is the context. (It is
slightly less detailed than what the chairs have circulated, but otherwise
similar other than addressing the category/respondent issue. Regards,
Miriam
-----
Dear tony/marilyn - i promised to provide you with my suggestions for the
draft report and also how to review the 3000. note i have not canvassed
other folks, as you requested. so i don't yet know, eg, whether laurence
would be interested in the background section or not. for those that are
lengthier, i put two names. note also that i have divided the categories so
that each constituency has between 8-17% of total, and that no one is
reviewing their own. can you plse let me know your thoughts today? thanks,
miriam
Layout of the report
Executive Summary - ISP and BC (this should wait, obviously,
until rest is done)
Introduction - cc
Background / Set stage for what the survey does/doesn't do -
IP
Survey information - All, see below
Interesting anomalies
Clear / consensus responses
Areas where more work is necessary
Suggestions as to the form of that additional work
Recommendations
[We shld divide review of the 3000, and report, by
category:
Commercial - GA and Registrar
Non-Comm org user - BC
Gov't user - NonComm
Individual - IP and cc
Registrar/Registry - NonComm
ISP - gTLD
Other - ISP
Overview - Registrar and NonComm
How to take the WHOIS issue to the next phase and what forum
- GA and gTLD
Miriam Sapiro
Director of International Policy
VeriSign, Inc.
1666 K Street, NW, Suite 410
Washington DC 20006
tel: 202-973-6600
fax: 202-466-9103
cell: 703-282-7117
email: msapiro@verisign.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Sapiro, Miriam [mailto:MSapiro@verisign.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 9:30 AM
To: 'Cade,Marilyn S - LGA'; 'NC-WHOIS'
Cc: 'Antonio Harris'; Juliano,Marie M - LGA; 'Glen'
Subject: RE: [nc-whois] drafting of the interim report... D. TBD
Importance: High
For everyone on line during our call now, I am sending a possible
elaboration to the draft outline that Marilyn and Tony circulated, which,
while comprehensive, does not seem to address the critical issue of
analyzing the data by category of respondent. I hope this is helpful on the
call. Note that the suggested assignments are purely notional, subject to
people volunteering for what they would like (other than the constituency
they represent!)
Survey information - Drafters: All, see below, by category....
Interesting anomalies
Clear / consensus responses
Areas where more work is necessary
Suggestions as to the form of that additional work
Recommendations
Dividing the analysis of 3000, by category, eg:
Commercial - GA and Registrar
Non-Comm org user - BC
Gov't user - NonComm
Individual - IP and cc
Registrar/Registry - NonComm
ISP - gTLD
Other - ISP
Miriam Sapiro
Director of International Policy
VeriSign, Inc.
1666 K Street, NW, Suite 410
Washington DC 20006
tel: 202-973-6600
fax: 202-466-9103
cell: 703-282-7117
email: msapiro@verisign.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA [mailto:mcade@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:26 PM
To: 'NC-WHOIS'
Cc: 'Antonio Harris'; Juliano,Marie M - LGA; 'Glen'
Subject: [nc-whois] drafting of the interim report... D. TBD
Importance: High
In our last call, the co-chairs noted that we would provide an outline for
the interim/draft report of the TV. What follows is the outline for the
full report, the relevant sections for an interim report are in bold. We
took the draft provided by Paul Kane, the original chair, updated the input
based on the work of the group, and are providing an updated outline. In our
call tomorrow, we will discuss and take input. BUT, assignments and
volunteers for drafting will be done offline so that we can manage
effectively in the meeting tem allocated.
Also, Miriam Sapiro, Tim Denton, and a couple of other participants
volunteered to offer suggestions on the outline of the report. Tony and
Marilyn have tried to take into account all input received to date.
Therefore, we attach it; will take questions, and will seek to finalize as
much as possible...on the call.
In the meantime, even as we take comment on the outline, we want to move
ahead with interim agreements so that the work of the TF continues.
The draft outline for a report on the survey is attached and will be one
segment of our discussion tomorrow on our call.
Please understand we will not be debating either format or assignments on
the call. So, treat this section accordingly. THE ONLY DISCUSSION IN THIS
SEGMENT IS CONTENT OF THE REPORT,NOT WHO PARTICIPATES IN DRAFTING.
ABOUT DRAFTING: Secondly, we are managing the broad interests and needs of
all TF participants. This is a drafting effort which involves a broad set
of interests. You aren't signing onto a final document at this point. All
TF members will have editing opportunities, regardless of whether you
drafted or not...
Tony and Marilyn, as chairs, will take input on volunteers for drafting
sections and will make assignments in a follow up memo. You can volunteer,
via email, for your first three priorities in drafting team assignments. We
will do our best to ensure that everyone gets into one of their three
preferences. Since there are many segments, this will be an art form for
Tony and Marilyn in terms of assignments. :-) You may get your first
choice, your second choice, etc. Our priority is the total outcome... help
us by being flexible and accommodating, in spite of personal prefererences.
That will advance the credibility and integrity of the TF with the community
and father our common goals.
We know we can count on you to be flexible and cooperative in this process.
as always.
Regards, Marilyn and Tony
> DRAFT OUTLINE FOR WHOIS REPORT
>
> I. Executive Summary (Marilyn and Tony will draft a very short statement
> for the interim report)
>
> II. Introduction
>
A. Purpose of the task force based on the terms of reference (suggested
drafters: Marilyn, Tony, Paul, Miriam)
B. History: What it is. How it is provided. How it is presently used.
How it exists. Thin vs. thick. Volume of use in
> .com, .org, .net (suggested drafters: Miriam Sapiro/other member of
> TF-- ask for volunteer )
>
> C/D. Methodology and Description of Analysis Process: (suggested
> drafter: Miriam Sapiro/___________)
> C. What we did. Timeframe. Questionnaire. (Appendix)
>
D. Description of Analysis Process
> 1. Analytical - 3,000
> 2. Statistical survey of narrative responses - 300
> 3. Additional assessment of full 3,000 narrative responses
>
> III. Analysis
>
> A. Analytical reports with charts (tabulations to go into
> appendix)
Marilyn/Tony/Miriam/Thomas: review of data/reports.
> B. Subjective review of 300 statistical responses -- Steve, Tony,
> Oscar, Troy, Thomas, Tim-provide narrative draft of findings, based on
> agreed to baskets. TF will provide edits.
>
> C. Subjective review of additional responses (3,000) time frame to
> be determined: Add in assistance from Miriam, Marilyn, Y.J., other
> volunteers...
> D. Description of any differences found between the 300 and the
> 3,000 (did it scale?)
TBD
> E. Final subjective analysis
TBD
> F. Integrative view (analytic and narrative)
TBD
> IV. Conclusion
TBD
> V. Recommendation
TBD
> A. Overview
> B. What should happen next
>
> VI. Appendices
>
> A. Questionnaire {available)
> B. Statistical responses (available)
> C. TBD
D. TBD
> E. Minority reports, if any
> F. Any other supplementary comments
> G. Members of the Task Force (historical map to
> changes...available)
>
>
>
>
> Marie M. Juliano
> AT&T Law & Government Affairs
> 1120 20th Street, N.W.
> 10th Floor
> Washington, D.C. 20036
> 202-457-2789
> 202-457-3051 (Fax)
> mjuliano@att.com
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|